SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: akidron who wrote (17425)3/9/1998 3:41:00 PM
From: Teri Skogerboe  Respond to of 70976
 
Aki, ***Off-topic***

RE: "u misunderstood...I'm trying to work out..."

Oh, no more posting for me today -g-, as I've been doing that a lot. I do, however, understand what you mean now. IMO, you guessed it right about the firm advising CPQ and DEC.

regards,
Teri

PS. Have a great time playing!



To: akidron who wrote (17425)3/9/1998 4:54:00 PM
From: Teri Skogerboe  Respond to of 70976
 
Aki ***Off-Topic***

Re: CPQ & DEC. Found this. This paragraph is on approx. Page 26.

sec.gov

SECTION 4.14. Finder's Fees. Except for Greenhill & Co. L.L.C. and
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, a copy of whose respective engagement agreements have been provided to the Company, there is no investment banker, broker, finder or other intermediary which has been retained by or is authorized to act on behalf of Parent or any of its subsidiaries who might be entitled to any fee or commission in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.



To: akidron who wrote (17425)3/10/1998 1:41:00 AM
From: Marc Trombella  Respond to of 70976
 
because I
cannot understand why DLG would upgrade CPQ


Many times, brokerages will upgrade a stock based purely on the price alone. CPQ is a bargain at these prices, down from its high. Even though it has not hit bottom yet, who wouldn't accumulate a few shares at this price?