SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_biscuit who wrote (3954)3/9/1998 7:51:00 PM
From: Alan Whirlwind  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42834
 
"$1.78 trillion today is not the same today as it was 15 years ago. It
is a much smaller piece of the pie (i.e. the "national economy") today
than it was then."

By that same argument, the Reagan deficits cannot be compared to the to those of Carter, under whose administration the dollar probably lost as much purchasing power as during the combined Reagan and Bush terms. Without the Reagan years, Clinton would not have had that bigger pie, though your last point is well taken. The minority Republicans in congress were much more effective during Clinton's first two years than during Reagan's last six. The day we start paying principal on our National Debt will be the day we see that dow go flying. If no, we'll eventually just be living to service our National credit card bill.

Pete: If Buffett is heavy into Coke I guess it's time to start melting silver bars down into sinkers for the fishing season again. ;)



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (3954)3/9/1998 10:27:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42834
 
dipy, not to mention how much of that $1.78 trillion was due to the interest from reagan's debt. forgot to mention that one, heh ;-)

anyway, there are two parties. republicrats and demicans. both want to railroad you and i for their benefit. they just use different angles. they are much more alike than different.