To: Skeptic who wrote (12407 ) 3/9/1998 6:21:00 PM From: Bonzo Read Replies (1) | Respond to
Skeptic there have been only a few who have posted "pie in the sky" future valuations. I disagree with that also since management itself doesn't seem to have a handle on the potential revenue its capable of generating over the next 2 years. Cheryl, Karl, Jack, Doc, JDN, and a few others have been posting positive information about the company for sometime - because TAVA does represent a most compelling investment. A tremendous amount of research has been done on this company (by these folks and many others), more so than any other stock I have ever been involved with. Excellent information for the individual investor (there is no doubt that we are way ahead of the investment community on this one) I have been able to verify a great deal of it. Its OK to play the devils advocate for a time, or to address certain issues with the company that seem to have negative implications for its shareholders - even if you are long its a worthwhile exercise or 'gut check". However, when the tone of EVERY single post that you make to this board is either negative, misinformed, inaccurate, defensive or detrimental to the company and its prospects then its natural to conclude that your presence here is less than honorable to us longs. So as a matter of ethical behavior on your part and on this thread, you Skeptic, and RS, need to come clean. What are your intentions here? Isn't BMY, KO, IVAX, Cargill, US Mint, GM, Cyprus Minerals, etc., etc. sufficient confirmation of TAVA's business potential? What about the increase from 30 Y2K clients to over 60 within one month? Is that not sufficient confirmation that this company has a bright future with Embedded Controller Y2K projects? I can assure you the aforementioned companies took a lot closer look at TAVA, its technical staff, its products and its management than you or anyone else on this board has the capability to do (with the exception of CK).
