Justice Dept. opposes Lockheed-Northrop merger Fort Worth Star-Telegram
WASHINGTON -- The Justice Department says it is ''fundamentally opposed'' to a merger of Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman, but the chairmen of the two defense industry giants say they will ''vigorously oppose any attempt to block'' the proposed deal.
The chairmen, Vance Coffman of Lockheed Martin and Kent Kresa of Northrop Grumman, issued a joint statement on Monday in response to concerns about a loss of competitiveness expressed by the Justice Department and the Defense Department.
Lockheed Martin officials said that Justice Department examiners raised questions about the dominant position the emerging company would have in surveillance radar and ground-based systems that detect missile launches.
Pentagon spokesman Ken Bacon said on Monday, ''We have serious concerns about the competitive effects of the transaction.''
But the companies' chairmen said: ''We continue to believe that the significant savings of $1 billion per year are available from the merger, the majority of which will accrue to our government customers.''
The companies said the Justice Department had informed the two companies that it is ''fundamentally opposed'' to the merger.
The deal, overwhelmingly approved by shareholders in February, is valued at $8.3 billion. Under the merger, which was expected to close March 24, each Northrop Grumman share would be converted into 1.1923 Lockheed Martin shares. Lockheed Martin has also said it would assume about $3.3 billion in Northrop Grumman debt as part of the deal.
Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman are the only makers of airborne early warning radar, most commonly found on Air Force E-3 AWACS aircraft and the Navy's EA-6B Prowler.
Both firms are also major players in infrared systems that detect missiles in flight and systems used to jam weapons that transmit electronic countermeasures to confuse radio communications.
Lockheed Martin also produces the F-16 fighter and is also building a major share of the coming F-22 Raptor, the Air Force's next-generation stealth fighter. Northrop Grumman produces parts for the C-17, a giant Air Force cargo jet, and portions of several commercial airliners.
The Defense Department examiners and high-ranking officials in both firms met during the weekend in an attempt to resolve problems, but were unsuccessful. The discussions are continuing.
''If the companies' attempts to resolve the (Justice Department's) concerns are not successful, it is anticipated the government will move to block the transaction,'' the chairmen's statement said.
Industry analysts said that they found the timing of the complaint unusual.
''It would not have been surprising if they had objected to it six months ago,'' said Jon Kutler, president of Quarterdeck Investment Partners, a Los Angeles firm that specializes in aerospace mergers and acquisitions. ''But now I think the timing is very unusual -- to let this drag on after the shareholder approval in February.''
The Justice Department objection to a defense industry combination also is surprising at a time when the government has allowed the industry to pare its ranks substantially. The industry is on the verge of having just three major companies, all the result of massive consolidations.
The merged Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman would be the industry's biggest competitor, with sales of $37 billion. It would be followed by the combined McDonnell Douglas and Boeing Co. Third would be Raytheon Co., which recently acquired Hughes Electronics from General Motors and the defense electronics unit of Texas Instruments, renaming the unit Raytheon TI.
Kutler said that if the government objects to the deal, it would cause far more harm to Northrop Grumman than Lockheed Martin.
''Lockheed Martin is still going to be a dominant player in this industry, with or without Northrop Grumman,'' he said. ''The damage will be to Northrop Grumman.''
On the New York Stock Exchange, Northrop Grumman stock dove $20.125 per share, or 14.6 percent, to close at $117.50. Lockheed Martin rose 81.25 cents per share to $116.00.
Wolfgang Demisch, an industry analyst at Bankers Trust in New York, questioned why the Justice Department would call into question Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin holdings in defense electronics. He said the government could probably be satisfied with a divestiture of elements of the companies valued between $200 million and $500 million.
Lockheed Martin, based in Bethesda, Md., had 1997 sales of $28.1 billion, compared to $9.1 billion for Los Angeles-based Northrop Grumman.
Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman employ about 19,000 workers in North Texas, with a payroll totaling almost $1 billion a year.
The two companies operate huge manufacturing and assembly facilities. Lockheed Martin's mile-long assembly plant, where 11,000 workers make the F-16, is on the west side of Fort Worth. Lockheed Martin Vought Systems also has eight missile engineering design sites in the Dallas suburb of Grand Prairie.
Northrop Grumman employs 5,000 workers at two mammoth plants, one straddling the Dallas-Grand Prairie border, and the other in Grand Prairie along Marshall Street, next door to one of Lockheed Martin's missile division plants.
The Northrop Grumman Commercial Aircraft division operates primarily as a subcontractor for Boeing Co., making tails and wings for the 747, 767 and 777 aircraft.
It also makes wings for Gulfstream executive jets, engine coverings for McDonnell Douglas C-17 transports and some fuselage parts for Northrop Grumman B-2 bombers.
The missile division and its 2,900 employees have worked primarily for more than a decade on the Army's workhorse multiple launch rocket system. It recently received a contract to design the upgraded Patriot missile. The missiles that Lockheed Martin designs in Grand Prairie are assembled in Camden, Ark. o~~~ O |