To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (17992 ) 3/11/1998 9:47:00 AM From: Daniel Schuh Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
Microsoft Adding to Java -- And to Sun Rift nytimes.com This story has been brewing for a week or so. I would have posted something earlier, but I've been laying back on the Java front of the war on the internet for a while. But, when it hits the NYT, it looks like a big story.Microsoft executives said Tuesday that they were departing further from the standard that Sun refers to as "100 percent pure Java" in an effort to give software programmers better performance and increased compatibility with Microsoft's Windows operating systems features. The move, underscored by Microsoft's decision for the first time to add several new keywords to the Java language that will run only on Windows, emphasizes the company's strategy of trying to wrest control of the Java standard from Sun. Or, what's mine is my and what's yours is mine. Embrace and Demolish! Will Java be integrated into the OS next? Or has that already happened?But Sun's version of the Java language, which is licensed by companies such as Netscape Communications, Oracle and IBM, has collided with Microsoft's "embrace and extend" philosophy of trying to influence Internet standards. There's that public consumption version. We all know a proprietary lock is a necessity in business, and Microsoft's most important task these days is to establish that proprietary lock aka monopolistic death grip on the internet. I guess Netscape's been officially declared dead, so it's on to the nascent threat of Java. It could replace Windows in a day! Bill said so himself, it must be true.Microsoft executives said press reports saying they were trying to create an entirely new language were "exaggerated," but they acknowledged that they were chafing under Sun's control of the Java standard. "There's been a concerted effort to keep Microsoft from innovating in the Java space," said Charles Fitzgerald, Microsoft's group product manager for platform marketing. "The keywords are pretty trivial. If you don't want to use them, you don't have to." He acknowledged, however, that programs written to include the new keywords would not run correctly on computers that do not use Windows. Ah, the much dreaded "innovation" company line, as in Microsoft must be free to innovatively leverage its OS monopoly to destroy any competition. Standard Microsoft business practice and all that. To recycle the high company official quote of the week:In January, when the company's chief operating officer, Bob Herbold, was asked what competing software firms could do when Microsoft decided to fold a product into Windows, Herbold told Bloomberg News that they had three options: fight and lose, sell to Microsoft or "not go into the business to begin with." So much for Gates' professed concern for preserving consumer choice and dynamic, competitive markets. (from salonmagazine.com Sherman Act? What Sherman Act? I don't see no Sherman Act. Concluding quote from the Times:"This is all about being able to manage heterogeneous computing environments," said Amy Wohl, a corporate computing consultant and president of Wohl Associates in Narberth, Pa. "How is Microsoft going to fit into that? Sometimes I think there's a basic misunderstanding at Microsoft on how large enterprises manage their computers." Well, what does she know? She Just Doesn't Understand Microsoft. Who needs a heterogeneous environment anyway? NT2k, the OS for the next millennium, will be available Real Soon Now. NT5BII, the Enterprise beta, might even get a ship date sometime soon. As for Java, well, all the developers who prefer the bitter taste of hemlock with their morning cuppa will flock to the new version, I'm sure. Cheers, Dan.