SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldsnow who wrote (8185)3/11/1998 7:33:00 PM
From: goldsnow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116764
 
Palladium surge raises substitution queries again
08:58 a.m. Mar 11, 1998 Eastern
By Patrick Chalmers

infoseek.com

LONDON, March 11 (Reuters) - Palladium fixed at fresh 18-year highs on
Wednesday, buoyed by continuing fears about delays in supplies from
Russia, raising questions again about whether it is a metal consumers
can rely on.

Palladium fixed at $256.00 an ounce, up on Tuesday afternoon's $247.50
and the $248.50 hit on January 14, making it a fresh high since March
1980.

Gains came both overnight in Tokyo and again when London opened, as
investors covered short positions.

''It was the rise in borrowing costs yesterday, with one-month borrowing
rates going over 20 percent, that sparked it off,'' said one London
dealer.

''It makes people nervous given what happened with lease rates last
year,'' he added, a reference to the near paralysis which struck
platinum group metal markets last June, after a six-month freeze in
supplies from Russia.

Rocketing lease rates, as well as frightening off those consumers who
usually borrow metal rather than carry expensive inventories, also
forces speculators to cover short positions.

''It stops people selling short because it gets too expensive to borrow
metal. That's probably what's driving it higher,'' the dealer added.

Russia supplied an estimated 3.2 million ounces of palladium in 1997,
compared with South Africa's 1.75 million ounces and total supplies of
5.65 million, according to leading refiner Johnson Matthey.

The metal is used extensively in car catalyst technologies to remove
noxious exhaust gases, as well as in high-grade electronics and
dentistry.

Technical chart points count for nothing as everything hinges on Russia,
the dealer said.

''I don't think you can say where prices will go to, it's a
fundamentally driven market. If the Russians supply metal early next
week, it could be back to $210 within days but if we are having this
same conversation again in a month, it might be at $275,'' he said.

Johnson Matthey marketing manager Jeremy Coombes said he had expected
deliveries by late March, a view widely held in the market.

''It's looking like we are going to be later than we thought. The
contradictory messages we are getting from Russia now means it's
probably going to be April at the very earliest although one doesn't
know whether it will be more serious,'' he told Reuters.

Almazjuvelirexport, Russia's sole platinum group metals (PGM) export
agency, said only on Tuesday it had received no word on when it might
get a government go-ahead to hold official talks with clients on 1998
exports.

Palladium prices have firmed steadily from $202.50 an ounce bid at the
start of the year amid reports of delays in Russian exports. Prices were
$120.75 at the start of last year.

Consumers were increasingly likely to seek alternatives, Coombes said.

''Price determines demand to some extent and availability determines it
for others,'' Coombes said, citing the example of Japanese electronics
manufacturers now having to pay more than 1,000 yen/gram for metal.

''That's very expensive and a great stimulus for them to advance their
plans to substitute palladium with nickel to the extent that it is
possible,'' Coombes said.

For car manufacturers, delivery uncertainty rather than price was their
main concern in the short term.

''They have tied up their technology for the next two or three years.
It's difficult to switch a catalyst,'' he said.

But car makers would do well to avoid relying on palladium at the
expense of other platinum group metals (PGMs), Coombes added.

One country reaping the benefit is South Africa, said commodities
analyst Stephen Briggs of Societe Generale Frankel Pollak in
Johannesburg.

''It's a huge bonus to the South Africans. It was particularly
beneficial to Impala, their interim results were better than a lot of
people expected largely because of the higher price they received for
palladium,'' he said.

Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IPLA.J) outdid most analysts' forecasts
with interim results on February 9 which showed attributable earnings
nearly doubling to 293 cents a share from 154 cents a year earlier.

Palladium is mined from the same ore bodies as its sister metal
platinum, which is far the more important one for South African mines.

''It's affecting all the South African platinum producers in roughly the
same way,'' Briggs said.

((Patrick Chalmers, London Newsroom +44 171 542 8057.
london.commodities.desk+reuters.com))



To: goldsnow who wrote (8185)3/11/1998 7:42:00 PM
From: goldsnow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116764
 
FEATURE - Pre-EMU forex speculation no grave concern
01:01 a.m. Mar 10, 1998 Eastern
By Pratima Desai

LONDON, March 10 (Reuters) - Economists across Europe dismiss as small
the chances of a market onslaught on currencies joining economic and
monetary union (EMU) between May this year and January 1999 when the
project is due to be launched.

Fear of central bank intervention and their ability to monopolise
forward rate markets, alongside political determination for a timely
start to the project, will keep markets under control, they say.

''The likelihood of speculative attacks on currencies joining EMU is
very low,'' said Luca Mezzomo, economist at Banco Commerciale Italiano
in Milan.

European Union finance ministers decided last September to announce
bilateral conversion rates among participating currencies on May 2,
eight months before the planned launch of the euro.

The conversion rates are expected to be based on the central parities of
the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM).

''They will announce the rates in May, and in practice they are not
committed to them until January but the threat of announced rates being
enforced will be enough to bring markets into line,'' said Mezzomo.

Speculative risk arises from the fact that the rates to be announced in
May are not legally binding under the Maastricht Treaty.

The chosen rates are a statement of preference and there could be a
problem if a currency was to trade at a different level from its pre-set
conversion rate on the last day of trading at the end of December 1997.

''Central banks can manipulate markets and ensure their preferences are
met. On the last trading day of 1998, there may have to be significant
intervention,'' said Michael Lewis, senior currency analyst at Deutsche
Morgan Grenfell in London.

''But it won't be necessary. The markets will have anticipated and
arbitraged away this eventuality.''

MARKETS HAVE DISCOUNTED EMU

Over the past two years volatility in the mark's European cross rates
has slowed to a trickle as rates converged close to their central ERM
parities.

Pricing in the options market also reflects the market's conviction that
EMU will go ahead without major upheavals in the remaining months.

Implied volatilities on options on the mark's crosses have dwindled,
with mark/French franc volatility at historic lows of not even one
percent compared with more than six percent two years ago. Options allow
the holder to buy or sell currency at a given date at a preset rate.

The lira has strengthened by more than 20 percent since March 1995 to
around 983 per mark amid growing expectations that Italy will be a
founder member of EMU. Its central ERM rate is 990 per mark.

Over the same period the yield difference between 10-year Italian bonds
and German bonds has dropped by more than six percent to about 0.30
percent.

Expectations are for EMU to go ahead with 11 countries. The core group
-- Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands --
is expected to be joined by Finland, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain.

''Markets are now focusing on the contribution of a country to the
economy of the euro-11 rather than on differences between them,'' said
Stephen King, chief European economist at HSBC James Capel in London.

CENTRAL BANKS COULD FLEX MUSCLES

Faced with the combined reserves of all 11 central banks, analysts doubt
whether currency markets will have the courage to start a protracted
battle before the start of EMU.

''My estimate of the reserves of the 11 is in excess of $200 billion,''
said Ray Attrill, director of analysis at 4CAST in London. ''The markets
are very unlikely to test their collective might.''

Interest rate convergence, expected to occur in the second half of this
year and essential for currency convergence may cause some anxiety.

''The period between May and January could be more comfortable if rates
had already converged,'' said Herve Goulletquer, chief economist at
Credit Lyonnais in Paris.

Convergence between French and German interest rates has already taken
place. The repo rate in both countries is 3.3 percent.

But between Ireland, with interest rates at 6.75 percent, and Germany,
interest rate convergence is still to come.

Attrill said the rate of convergence -- to the ERM central rate --
between the lira and the mark will be dependent on the pace of
convergence between their interest rates.

KEEPING AN EYE ON FORWARDS

Yield differentials between those countries hoping to be founder members
of EMU can be seen in the forwards market, where currencies can be
bought or sold for delivery at a future date.

One mark will buy around 3.3525 French francs -- near the ERM central
parity at 3.3539 -- whether the delivery date is tomorrow, next week, in
May or at the end of December.

But the Irish punt, trading about 2.4850 marks, is almost three percent
higher than the ERM central rate at 2.4111.

For early May or end-1998 one Irish punt will buy around 2.4750 marks or
2.4580 respectively. Both forward exchange rates remain significantly
above the ERM central rate because of the yield differential to be
gained by holding Irish punts.

But despite some remaining divergence there is little to be gained for
speculators, analysts said.

''Governments could take the lead in offering to buy and sell forward
contracts for end-December to ensure they get the rates they want,''
said Lewis. ''Who is going to bet against them?''

Another pointer for a smooth transition to EMU is the financial turmoil
in Asia and its impact on the mark's crosses.

King at HSBC contrasts the relative stability of mark crosses since the
Asian turmoil started with the Mexico crisis in December 1994.

''Then investors bought marks causing problems for the more volatile
European currencies,'' King said. ''There has been no safe-haven flow
into marks over the past few months.''

Probability of turbulence could rise if the dollar fell significantly.
But analysts said the correlation between the U.S. currency and mark
crosses is not as strong as it used to be. Moreover, the dollar is well
supported by the strength of the U.S. economy.

''For example, dollar/mark would have to drop to 1.35, before mark
crosses became volatile,'' Lewis said.

A possible source of turmoil may be verbal expressions of
dissatisfaction with agreed conversion rates.

''It could be a starting point because if taken seriously then the whole
process of negotiating conversion rates would have to start again,''
said Gerhardt Grebe, chief economist at Bank Julius Baer in Frankfurt.

But Grebe saw a minimal chance of this happening given that all
conversion factors have to be agreed unanimously. ((London newsroom, +44
171 542 2737, fax +44 542 5293, uk.forex.news+reuters.com))