Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Airstar Technologies, Inc. (ASTG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Financial Internet Group who wrote (1550)	3/9/1998 10:57:00 PM
From: uu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3967

* Response from the NetWork * SEE-BS is proud to announce the return of Evangelist Lanza. Let us review Evangelist's return speech. Despite the unique passion that exists in the speech this reporter notices one repeating sentence! Evangelist Lanza states the following: So all of you, please order out your shares and take delivery. Now let us examine a couple of Evangelist's past speeches: ************************************************** Speech given by Evamgelist Monday, Jan 6 1997 1:31PM EST Message 620953 Sam the Man: I think you might have a problem! Sammy, you are a cute guy--who ever you are. Are you part of the 1,120,866 shares short? Are you having a hard time finding somebody to sell you shares so you can get off? Isn't life a bitch! Well, Sammy, keep on shorting; were 25% short, got to 100%. As long as the investor takes delivery and Xecom sign ups keep growing, have a shoft life. And to answer your ridiculous question, where to find information--Edgar, Bloomberg, Disclosure, S&P and Profit Magazine, just to mention a few. Lastly, Costa Mesa, Selectel--what does that have to do with Xecom? Xecom sold Selectel in August so what is the point? Oh, let me guess! Are we trying to scare the investor? Last question, where would Xecom share prices be if you and your friends had to buy 1,120,866 shares? $5.00 could be low, don't you think? January 6, 1997, let the games begin. In 1996 you guys won, however, this is not Vegas; a corporation goes on and on, get my drift? To keep everybody on the same page. In January the company is looking for not less than 20,000 people on line--love to see 26,000. 20,000 x 30.00 = $600,000 sales net 27.50 = 490,000 less expenses. February: 20,000 - 35,000; March: 33,000 - 45,000. So Sammy, please continue shorting. It is now just a matter of time for us. Cash talks; B.S. walks! P.S. Maybe your code name should be Sammy the Mouth; what do you think? Speech given by Evangelist Lanza on Monday, Mar 3 1997 6:40PM EST Message 919504 Dave, that is why I ask all shareholders to take delivery. In 3 weeks, only one person has taken delivery. You are right however, that MM have capital but not as much as you think. The clearing firm may, but I don't think that everybody has a real idea of the amount of potential damage they are facing. The volume today was strange. However March is the last month for the Canadians. So, let gourge ourselves on these b.s. prices before they disappear. But, take delivery!!! They sure don't like the .66 bid do they? Lanza ************************************************ So as you can see it seems XECM's problems and the reason for the stock not moving up are strictly because shareholders do not take delivery*! Now let us examine this! Does this mean that if you buy XECM, you have to ask your broker to send you the certificates of your shares so those darn communist Canadians could not possibly short the stock?! If so this reporter also asks all the share holders to PLEASE take delivery, and eventhough the price of the stock may not go up, you can at least use the certificates in your bathroom to show off to your friends and family as having the most expensive bathroom tissues in the world. Also should anyone call Evangelist Lanza per his request, it would be beneficial to ask him the following questions that this reporter has asked many times with absolutely no response: Evangelist Lanza, exactly how many XECM shares do you personally* own and what is your average price per share considering you have invested - per your claim - over $3.2 million dollars.** Should anyone ask the above question and a reasonable reply is obtained this reporter will appreciate it if the response is posted on this thread. And finally for your philosophical and intelectual pleasures SEE-BS is proud to repeat a previous show that was aired a few weeks ago: Message 3401727 Long Live XECM (the popular SEE-BS sit-com!) techstocks.com

To: Financial Internet Group who wrote (1550)	3/16/1998 3:43:00 PM
From: Wes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3967

MESSAGE TO FINANCIAL INTERNET GROUP Do you have a WEB site? If not, why not? You have the word internet in your name. Does XECOM have an internet site? Why not? No answer is needed, just something to think about. Wes

To: Financial Internet Group who wrote (1550)	3/17/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: Thomas Jon Swift	Respond to of 3967

Hey Joe, A few basic questions regarding XECM: According to XECM management and/or the figurings of IFN, what revenues are required to render XECOM net profitable? When, if ever, does management believe net profitability will be achieved. What does XECM management believe total quarterly expenses will be for 1998, including interest, depreciation, and other non-operating costs. On a per quarter basis, what are revenue projections for 1998. If revenues are expected to increase, please summarize how this is expected to be achieved. Please be as clear and straightforward as the English language allows. I have followed this thread for a long time and despite the sludge that appears here have held on to a significant number of XECM shares. XECM shareholder should know that an internet search for "XECOM" turns up only two entries--one regarding the XECOM that makes modems, which is not our XECOM, and the other is this thread. Imagine what any prospective investor must think reading the crap that appears here. If anyone believes XECOM is a total, outright bust please explain in as clearly and straightforwardly as the English language allows. P.S. The third quarter 10-Q states that Select Switch had approximately 32,000 soldiers signed up as of November 11, 1997. What EXACTLY is the number as of March 17, 1998. Thanks, Joe, in advance for a prompt, complete and accurate response