To: tonyt who wrote (17019 ) 3/10/1998 1:28:00 AM From: Flagrante Delictu Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32384
tonyt, >> a rhetorical question << I would prefer not to have to do this. But, I think we have to start at the bottom . A question is a question. A question is not a declarative sentence. I will now quote what you wrote, " The question, for which FUGAZI supplied an answer to his own first question, the one where, as you noted appeared to be rhetorical, was " Some seemed to be confident that we'd learn of their decision this week. I guess not.", { I hate to inform you that from " Some " to "not" is not a question. Instead of a question, you have written two declarative sentences. These two sentences comprised FUGAZI's single answer to his own question} Unfortunately the aforementioned & the subsequent words appear to be an Abbott & Costello comedy routine. We pick up "so the question to which he supplied an answer was not his own first question but his own second question., that being the question of when we'd learn of their decision. not what that decision would be." FUGAZI didn't ask when we'd get the answer. He speculated that we would not get an answer as to when. Have you forgotten that you have already posted that his answer was "Some seemed to be confident that we'd learn of their decision this week .I guess not." Unfortunatly you misconstrued that answer to be a question, even though there were no question marks, and it was obviously not a question by any standard, no matter how low. Hint, questions are usually tipped off to observant readers, if not by their content, then definitely by the question mark that appears at their end to remind those who are reading the words, that a question was being asked, rather than a declaration being made.We pick up, " The question of what their decision would be remained unanswered, as we learned that " wait 'til Monday" had nothing to do with "Did LGND take the money & run or did they select a drug?" { Please note the question mark}., but actually "wait 'til Monday" was the answer to FUGAZI's third question, which was not a question at all {Hey.ABBott!!!}, not even a rhetorical question, but in fact was a request for comments when FUGAZI stated : " AS I stated earlier, looks to be forming a base between 14.5 and 15.5 range when it has never really stayed in this price zone for a long period of time.Anyone have any comments about this?" { Do you expect us to believe that" Anyone have any comments about this?" is not a question, or do you expect us to believe it is FUGAZI's fourth question? Or did he get one off for good behavior? We continue," now since Ligand did indeed announce Monday after the bell that " Ligand Pharm etc."", it appears that "wait 'til Monday" was indeed an answer to the first question asked by FUGAZI, which was " Did LGND take the money & run, or did they select a drug?". { Please notice the question mark}. That is admittedly a question, but once again you are wrong when you state that Henry's answer applies to that question. Henry, himself, has stated that his answer applies to the second question. FUGAZI had already answered his own rhetorical question. Why should we assume your interpretation is viable when it contradicts Henry's statement as to which question he answered: and, when it defies logic,since that question had already been answered by FUGAZI,himself?