Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (50386)	3/10/1998 7:28:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

>>YOU WERE WRONG!<< >>You stated Intel did not show quarterly earnings increases and they did - from Q397 to Q497.<< paul i didn't say that. prove me wrong, paul. show anybody where i said quarterly increases in growth? show anybody - your invisible little friend doesn't count ;-) btw, for those with a semblence of rationality, the term "growth" implies yty and not qtq sequential growth b/c qtq sequential growth is A HORRIBLE MEASURE OF ACTUAL GROWTH DUE TO THE SEASONAL FACTORS. i said intel wasn't a growth company. the absurd comparison was your sequential qs. the rational comparison was yty. i was dead right. yty comparisons are THE ONLY VALID COMPARISONS. qtq have WAY TOO MANY SEASONAL FLUCTUATIONS THAT DO NOT REPRESENT GROWTH!!!! HELLO?!?! IS ANYBODY HOME?!?!?! IS THIS TOO HARD A CONCEPT TO GRASP? WILL ANYBODY ON THIS THREAD COME TO PAUL ENGEL'S DEFENSE AND ARGUE THAT Q3/Q4 IS A BETTER GAUGE OF GROWTH THAN Q4/Q4? ANYBODY? saying i said qtq sequential growth is nonsense. i NEVER said it. speaking of redefining reality. PAUL, I NEVER SAID QTQ GROWTH. YOU SAY I DID. PROVE IT. oh what a tangled web the confused weave. MUST YOU RESORT TO LYING NOW? IS DESPERATION THAT BAD?