Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hippieslayer who wrote (17055)	3/10/1998 10:42:00 AM
From: tonyt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32384

Thats what most of us here thought. Thanks, --Tony

To: Hippieslayer who wrote (17055)	3/10/1998 10:59:00 AM
From: Henry Niman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32384

Well, I didn't want to go through the list of misrepresentations that began on Friday because the list was so long. However, a new set is beginning this morning, and the list is shorter, so it's probably useful to see how the misrepresentations are done. Your original post was on Friday: Message 3627455 and your second paragraph was: "BTW, it's very interesting to see LGND stay steady in a huge bear market (thurs) and in a huge bull market (today). AS I stated earlier, lgnd looks to be forming a base bewteen 14.5 and 15.5 range when it has never really stayed in this price zone for a long period of time. Anyone have any comments about this?" to which I responded, "What what happens on Monday!": techstocks.com Confusion arose, so Saturday morning I tried to clear it up, by saying that there was no specific event scheduled for Monday: Message 3632937 This morning I noted again that I was responding to your second paragraph since your first paragraph was rhetorical: techstocks.com This morning, the misrepresentations started on a new front. Instead of asking about your post on Friday, the discussion shifted to your post on Monday!: Message 3653208 Message 3658617 and you started talking about Monday's post!: Message 3658829 Then you were asked about trading ACTIVITY (the original post asked about a trading range of 14 1/2 to 15 1/2): Message 3658974 and you denied asking about trading ACTIVITY!: Message 3659204 I'm not sure if you are also trying to mislead, but in effect you have tried to deny what you posted and such a denial merely extends the long list of misleading posts (which was just extended AGAIN!): Message 3659684