Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : WARNING- have you been warned by SI? Let's talk -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (440)	3/10/1998 12:02:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1614

The discussion never ends here Pugsley.

To: Pugs who wrote (440)	3/10/1998 12:33:00 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Respond to of 1614

One of the more respectable messages I've ever seen you post. Thanks. you will find him posting, at his peak, 8-10 hours a day, 7 days a week. I think this boils down to a disagreement over what constitutes "posting 8-10 hours per day". If you're saying his posts can be found within an 8-10 range any day of the week, I'd agree with you. If you're saying he spends 8-10 hours per day, 7 days per week, doing nothing but posting to SI, I strongly disagree. I'm a prolific poster, and am likely to post anytime between 8 AM and 3 AM, 7 days a week, but probably spend an average of 30 minutes per day posting here. In any event, it has appeared to me that he spent far less time posting than you do. If you are arguing that the OTC BB is not be abused by illegal , undeclared, naked shorting, that is your opinion It is my opinion that the OTCBB is positively rife with such abuses. It is not, however, my opinion that it happens to 100% of the OTCBB companies, nor that it can be relied on as an excuse for every BB stock that doesn't make people money. The math can be found doing DD on the RMIL thread. But, we have 2.13MM shares certified in a float of 2.17MM shares with 3.3MM shares called. If the company would release audited financials showing that the float and o/s are as they claim on the phone, I think you'd have a serious smoking gun. Personally, I think the only thing that matters regarding that company is what the company will publicly say in the form of press releases. Granted, they've blatantly lied in previous ones, but I doubt they'd do it now in the face of assured SEC scrutiny. Hard, cold facts about the company matter much more than our opinions of each other.