To: goldsnow who wrote (8206 ) 3/10/1998 9:50:00 PM From: goldsnow Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116764
Jakarta's stalled reforms frustrate IMF By Colleen Ryan, Washington The stand-off between the IMF and Indonesia could undermine efforts to stem the financial turmoil in Asia if it were not resolved soon, the IMF's managing director, Mr Michel Camdessus, warned yesterday. Speaking at an IMF conference on liberalisation of international capital flows, Mr Camdessus maintained a particularly hard line on Indonesia commenting, in answer to questions, "We still believe that if this problem is not resolved soon, the whole thing is at risk." Mr Camdessus' remarks were made against the background of continued strong support by the US Administration for the IMF's reform program. The US ambassador to Indonesia, Mr J Stapleton Roy, has returned to Washington for discussions following the apparently unsuccessful Jakarta visit of presidential envoy Mr Walter Mondale last week. The IMF was to have approved a second tranche of $US3 billion in financial assistance to Indonesia next week but has delayed this until next month at the earliest. Mr Camdessus confirmed the delay yesterday, pointing to the absence of an Indonesian Cabinet with which to finalise economic plans. "It will take certainly until April until we are ready," Mr Camdessus said, referring to IMF executive board action on further funding. He added that a long list of structural measures was needed in Indonesia under the reform program agreed with the IMF earlier this year. Mr Camdessus emphasised that the issue of a currency board was not the only matter causing problems. "We are a little bit frustrated that the kind of diversion coming from the debate on the surrealistic proposal of the currency board has in some ways occupied too much the minds while important things have to be done on issues like banking and restructuring corporate debt. "I must say that particularly in view of the very high risk of human suffering and the risk of ethnic strife . . . we want to do everything possible to help this country." Yesterday's conference in Washington was dominated by calls for changes to the architecture of the international financial system. However, while the speakers were agreed on the need for change they were noticeably short on prescriptions for measures to improve the system. Mr Larry Summers, deputy-secretary of the US Treasury, warned the conference that: "We cannot leave ourselves to face the kind of dilemma the world community faced [late last year] between chaos, confusion and contagion on the one hand, and large bailouts on the other. "We all need to look at the international financial system and do what we can to change it so that we don't have crises of the kind we are now experiencing or the kind we experienced in Mexico or the kind we experience in the European exchange rate mechanism every three years." The conference was called to discuss liberalisation of international capital movements and, in particular, the expanded role of the IMF. Last September, at the annual meeting of the IMF in Hong Kong, the board of governors agreed that it was time to "add a new chapter to the Bretton Woods agreement" and amend the IMF's articles of agreement to make liberalisation of capital movements one of the purposes of the fund. Mr Camdessus addressed the issue of whether the perceived benefits of free capital markets still made sense in the light of the Asian crisis. He argued that the problems of Indonesia, Korea and Thailand arose not because they had opened their capital accounts but because the countries with the most open capital accounts in the region, Hong Kong and Singapore, were among the most successful in dealing with the crisis. "The difficulties arose from the macro-economic environment and institutional setting in which they opened their capital accounts and the way in which measures to open their capital accounts were sequenced with other reforms," he said.