Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (9986)	3/11/1998 2:01:00 AM
From: Bruno Steinhauser	Respond to of 13949

to Silicon Investors thread is anybody out there interested in information for a strong growth potential stock in aviation software? Stock is presently trading at $ 1,15 $ 1,20 with conservative net earning expectations of $0,04 for fiscal year 99 which starts in Mai 98. Progressive considerations expect $ 0,15 for fiscal year 99 and $ 0.35 for fiscal year. Company recently has been nominated on March 10th by Aviation Week & Space Technology for technology innovation award. Distribution and licence agreements for sales and marketing are already in place for europe, africa and asia. for detailed information refer to web page http:www.mercury.bc.ca or send an e-mail to Bsteinha07@aol.com (e-mail adress in Germany) or Bsteinh772@aol.com (e-mail in the US for the period March 15th to June 25th) Bruno Steinhauser

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (9986)	3/11/1998 6:41:00 PM
From: GoodQ	Respond to of 13949

Cheryl: True. You will continue to see some current software and hardware to be Non Y2K compliant. However, at the pc level, its life cycle is short due to technology evolution. Most machine will be fixed thru normal upgrades and replacement. Some of us believe, vendors will fix whatever is left beginning in mid 1999. No need to do it sooner(just good business sense). The major Y2K problems remain in embedded systems and large corporation IT. The first case is because most people have no idea/knowledge of internal workings of a system, and how software/firmware are used in those systems. (Even engineers nowaday designs with black boxes and don't know what is in the box); and the second case is just the size of the codes. GQ