SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : GTIS - Will it be a Phoenix or not ? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Caruthers who wrote (1696)3/11/1998 2:06:00 AM
From: Chris McConnel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2319
 
>>> Doesn't anyone want to talk about GTIS' prospects or lack thereof? <<<

Yes, I'd like to, as matter of fact. Glad you brought up.

First off, i'm still amazed and baffled that this stock has not hit 4 since announcing the 4qtr loss. Can anyone explain to me why this accounting change is viewed as a good thing (if is was not viewed as good thing why did the stock go up after the announcement)? The only good thing i can see, GT is owning up to not fully disclosing the extent of their expenses. I mean, hey, does anybody remember seeing "Unexpensed Prepaid Royalties" anywhere on their quarterly statements in 1995, 1996 or 1997?

If they had been expensing the prepaid royalties all long, it would have, IMO, significantly brought down the EPS and raised the PE. Now, going forward, since they are expensing all prepaid royalties as they occur, won't it lower the EPS? I just don't think GTIS has been as profitable as we were led to believe.

Also, are we sure that they have fully written off ALL the unexpensed prepaid royalties. Reading the Merrill Lynch reports, i'm not so sure.

Second, how significantly is Gathering of Developers going to change the economics of games development and publishing. If G.O.D. is able to convince enough developers they will earn more money on their games, publishing them through G.O.D., will GTIS by able to find enough content to keep it's distribution mechanism in full operation? And if GT is unable to sign up enough developers, will they be able to build up enough internal studios quickly enough to fill the void.

Even if G.O.D. does not land all the developers, the ones that do sign with GT will be able to use G.O.D. as leverage to negotiate better contracts with GT and other publishers. This could hurt GT bottom line. Also, if G.O.D. is offering the best royalties, will they be able to pick and choose only the cream of the crop games and reject the ones with lesser market potential, leaving GT with all the less profitable games.

- Chris



To: Tom Caruthers who wrote (1696)3/11/1998 10:10:00 AM
From: Frank Arena  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2319
 
Tom, do you really find this amusing? I think it has completely side tracked this thread and is getting a little old ( do ya hear V ). BTW if anyone hears any news on GTIS I'm interested

Regards Frank



To: Tom Caruthers who wrote (1696)3/11/1998 12:15:00 PM
From: RJC2006  Respond to of 2319
 
<<<If I didn't find this harangue so amusing, I'd actually say STOP IT ALREADY!!!!

Doesn't anyone want to talk about GTIS' prospects or lack thereof?

Tom C ;) Placed here so that I do not become a target of Victoria's
unique wit!>>>

No, this is far more entertaining and amusing then any discussion of GTIS stock.