To: kahunabear who wrote (14901 ) 3/11/1998 9:35:00 PM From: Bonnie Bear Respond to of 94695
whipsaw: I'm sitting in the " stable value fund" option out of five or so choices in my company 401K fund. When I look through the top holdings of the five or so "approved" funds all of them have a high proportion of garbage stocks in the top holdings. The annual return is pretty much what you expect- there's a couple of quarters each year of great returns, one with no return, one where most of the year's gains are lost in the space of about two days. This goes on year after year. The bond fund has lost more money than sitting in money-market over the last five years. Meanwhile the average pension plan management house stock price has quadupled over the last three years. Our best-returning fund was the Martin Marietta Materials stock fund. People who invested in the gravel company spin-off got triple the return from the high-tech-laden "conservative" growth and income funds. You have no idea how many mutual funds I've looked at-most are on steroid stocks. When the fund managers have their own money in the fund the holdings look very different. Not all stocks are bad, there will always be a place for stocks, but a huge problem is that the 401K participants have little control in the stock selection, and stocks on steroids are easier for the managers to buy in large quantities. after all, it's not their money. :-( There's a growing faction of managers looking for substantial interest-rate increases in the next four quarters. This will certainly deflate the bubble. If China is looking at a 15-20% increase in M2 and the asian countries keep printing currency and converting it to dollars, there has to be a day of reckoning for the US. I just don't understand how interest rates can go down, not up, from here, unless mass unemployment sets in. I see the mutual fund companies as chameleons- they will adapt to whatever becomes fashionable in the future. We'll probably see speculative excesses in oil-and-gas, metals, unobtainium futures, etc, they'll be there for their customers with a product. I just don't think the american public is bright enough to figure out they would get better returns by investing in the stock of the pension houses instead of the mutual fund products offered by them.