Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ben Antanaitis who wrote (49719)	3/11/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: Gottfried	Respond to of 58324

Ben, these guys with an agenda crack me up. They're so transparent. GM <eom>

To: Ben Antanaitis who wrote (49719)	3/11/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: Linda Pearson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Ben, he's ALWAYS said this about IOM! Linda

To: Ben Antanaitis who wrote (49719)	3/11/1998 12:33:00 PM
From: Bald Eagle	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

<<Notorious short seller David Rocker>> Never heard of the guy, what's his track record? Why does he wait this long to recommend short selling. Did he recommend short selling when IOM was in the teens not too long ago. This guy might be one of those contrarian indicators. Perhaps, he wants to cover his shorts, so wants others to sell to him. I'm just a big skeptic to any recommendation on CNBC. Got burned too many times.

To: Ben Antanaitis who wrote (49719)	3/11/1998 2:03:00 PM
From: E. Graphs	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

Ben, RE:>>Rocker said IOM product was a fad that is over and the new products are all flops in the making.<< Good, let's sue him! <g> Mr. Rockster ought to be more careful. If Iomega's shareholders are capable of suing their very own company a million times to death then we are perfectly capable of taking this guy on. Does he know that he's dealing with madness here? How can he sleep? <G> The stock sure looks tired today. Let's hope there's power in the number 8 and we can bounce back from there at least. E