Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Flagrante Delictu who wrote (17237)	3/11/1998 3:30:00 PM
From: dwc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32384

Bernie: ...the virgin entry...?? very Freudian

To: Flagrante Delictu who wrote (17237)	3/11/1998 4:12:00 PM
From: Jack Be Quick	Respond to of 32384

Bernie, <<My first question is, Is this what we have had to wait so long for, while you hesitated until you had something " significant to contribute", before you would post here ?" >> Well, how long you've had to wait sort of depends on how long you've been waiting. Presumably, someone just stumbling across this thread today would not have had to wait very much time at all. Unless, of course, they started back at message #1. But then, they would in all likelihood not have discovered my post yet, and speaking of them as having had to wait so long for something they have not yet experienced would perhaps be mixing tenses. But that is neither here nor there. So, to answer your question, yes, this/that is/was it. <<My next question is, " How much longer will we have to wait, for something to equal in significance,your suggestion for a suspension in trading in LGND, as well as the certification you also seem to suggest ?">> What, do you want to make an appointment? Really, who can say? I do not know if or when I will have something more to add. And I certainly do not know what anyone else's circumstances might be should the occasion (mirable dictu) arise. For instance, I might post it when some of you are asleep, or on a day that you do not check the messages. You pose a question that I am unable to answer. <<I suspect you are capable of significantly more valuable suggestions.>> Well, thanks, I guess. Sorry you are disappointed by my current suggestions. Nonetheless, I think that at least one of my suggestions has more merit than you seem to credit. If you disagree, as I said before, fine. Simple difference of opinion. Regards, John