Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (21463)	3/11/1998 6:46:00 PM
From: TIMMY T.	Respond to of 97611

In case this hasn't been posted. biz.yahoo.com -TIMMY T.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (21463)	3/11/1998 6:47:00 PM
From: robbie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Michael, re:<<When somebody says the fundamentals are fine, and then mentions that the stock is up today as way of proof, I assume he doesn't know what fundamentals are. Sorry if I misread your note. MB>> Here is Eddie Kim's post: >>Only fundamentals matter in the long haul, and CPQ no longer has any. By what rational are you using when say this? The fundamentals look pretty good to me. Could this be the day when CPQ ends its 12 day losing streak?>> I don't think he's arguing that the fundamentals are fine and is mentioning the stock is up today as proof. I believe he is asking you your rationale for saying CPQ doesn't have any fundamentals, and then wondering if the stock goes up today. I notice you haven't answered his question yet. I'd like you hear your answer myself. Robbie P.S. What's this "hairpiece" stuff? You're not a name-calling baby too are you? Maybe I should post that over on the "Ask MB" thread. Naaah, must be real slow over there, otherwise you wouldn't need to come over here for an audience.