Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (50538)	3/12/1998 1:03:00 AM
From: ed	Respond to of 186894

You are emotional again !!!!! As to the statement that "equivalent is not the same ", it is really surprised me that you do not understand that statement . I think you realize that For PII CPUs , we can not find any two PII CPUs which will perform the same in this world, we can only find two which are equivalent in performance, even they are all built with dies side by side on the same wafer. You agree ? When you say two CPUs are exactly the same , that means the speed performance , DC performance, functionally , the dopping, the transistor characteristics are all the same, then , we will say the two CPUs are the same. Unfortunally based on our current technology , such things did not exist. For example we are equivalent, but the only difference is mine is 140, and yours is 130, we are equivalent in a way, but not the same. Sorry for my personal attack on you, I do not like to be that way, but you start it !!!!