SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications-News Only!!! (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: djane who wrote (1282)3/13/1998 12:48:00 PM
From: djane  Respond to of 1629
 
Williams Cos. (ASND customer) nice article in Microsoft investor.com entitled "Dialtone in the Pipeline"

beta.investor.com

Posted 3/13/98
Archived 3/20/98

TGIF
Dialtone in the Pipeline
Natural-gas giant Williams Cos. is remaking itself as a telecom
leader. Will its vast new fiber-optic network click with investors?
By Roger Hahn

Qwest Communications (QWST) upped the stakes this week in the
nation's increasingly intense fiber-optic network wars by announcing
that it planned to acquire LCI International (LCI) and create the
fourth-largest U.S. telephone company. The deal, if approved by
regulators and shareholders, would rank the combined new
company behind only AT&T (T), Sprint (FON) and WorldCom
(WCOM).

Remaining unranked in the telecommunications-giant-of-the-future
contest -- and a lot cheaper than most of its rivals -- is a fierce
competitor whose primary business isn't even data and voice. And
that firm, Williams Cos. (WMB), could ultimately be a superior bet
for many investors than any of its better-known foes.
Highlighted
Companies

3 Yrs. Vs. S&P
AT&T

Concentric Network

Intermedia

Qwest

Sprint

U S West

Williams

WorldCom
Williams, which is more renowned as the nation's leading owner of
natural-gas pipelines, kicked off 1998 by announcing three contracts
with phone companies to lease capacity on a 32,000-mile fiber-optic
network it is building. In addition to a five-year, multimillion-dollar
deal with U S West Communications (USW) -- which Williams
described as akin to a mall signing on an "anchor tenant" --
agreements were signed with Intermedia Communications (ICIX) and
Concentric Network Corp. (CNCX), in which Williams owns a 21%
stake.

The beauty in Williams' push to build a national fiber-optic network
is that it is no rookie at the endeavor. In 1995, Williams sold its first
fiber-optic network to WorldCom for $2.5 billion, retaining rights to a
single trunk line. Indeed, without Williams' original vision to build a
national fiber network during a time of faltering natural-gas prices in
the 1980s, you might never have heard of WorldCom.

A Natural Fit
What's a natural-gas pipeline firm doing in telecommunications?
Using its vast network of rights-of-way to lay cable, for one thing.
"Pipelines," Williams chief executive Howard Jantzen has said, "are
just large national networks requiring many of the same processes
as telecom networks to operate efficiently."

Indeed, the entire natural-gas industry has caught telecom fever.
Pipeline firms are the first segment of the nation's utility
infrastructure freed by a two-decade-long deregulatory process. The
firms several years ago left the safe harbor of wholesale energy
transmission to explore businesses that promise faster growth and
fatter profits. The best have been enviously successful.
Details

Company Facts

3-Year Chart

* Advisor FYI

* Earnings Estimates

* Insider Trading

Consider, for example, that $10,000 invested in Williams Cos. five
years ago would be worth $51,149 today -- a far cry from the
$23,332 that an investment in the Standard & Poor's 500 Index
would be worth, or the $42,230 you'd have in WorldCom and
$26,194 you'd have in Sprint.

Going forward, the prospects look even brighter -- though there is
ample reason for caution. Following a year in which natural-gas
pipeline companies overall underperformed their peers in the energy
sector, the group's leaders find themselves trying to decide what
they really want to be when they grow up. Some are beginning to
look more like wild and crazy oil-and-exploration companies, whose
fortunes fluctuate with commodity prices. Others, like Williams, are
trying to straddle the old and new worlds. Williams is acquiring more
gas-pipeline concerns to bolster revenue and earnings growth in the
short term while laying the groundwork to become a telecom giant
early in the next century.

Once these uncertainties are cleared away, leading industry
analysts believe that Williams, and possibly others, could be the
surprise blue-chip stocks of tomorrow.

"There's certainly some confusion and uncertainty surrounding the
group," says Susan Weaver, of the brokerage Howard, Weil,
Laboussie, Friedrichs, "but ultimately, the long-term potential clearly
is there. What the group's proponents are betting on is a Warren
Buffett approach: Buy 'em and hold 'em. The thinking is, if you can
hold on for a year or two, you could double your money."

Even a skeptical observer argues that dramatic returns could begin
appearing as soon as this summer. After all, the value equation is
clear: Qwest's trailing price-earnings multiple is stratospheric at
494, while WorldCom's P/E is 94. Williams' P/E multiple of 30 looks
positively cheap on a relative basis, and it's a result of Wall Street
not believing it will grow as fast as its more glamorous rivals.

"Typically, gas-pipeline companies tend not to perform well when
natural-gas prices are struggling," says David Fleischer of Goldman
Sachs. "Also, coming out of winter, these stocks tend not to do
well. So I really can't get excited about the next three months. But
these are solid, well-run companies, and the best should grow 15%
or better a year. They're available now at nice, low valuations. And
their performance could get a lot more interesting in about six
months."
What's not to like,
really, about a stock
like Williams? Last
year, its shares
posted returns of
52%.
A Diversified Stock
What's not to like, really, about a stock like Williams? Last year, its
shares posted returns of 52%. Its vast fiber-optic network is the
second the company has built, giving it an edge in experience. It
has a successful division that carries broadcast video transmissions
for the TV networks. And its successful energy-marketing division
was bolstered significantly by last fall's acquisition of MAPCO, a
liquids pipeline, refining and marketing company chosen for its
geographic and strategic fit.

Ice that cake with the recent fiber-optic leasing deals, and what have
you got?

"About a third of Williams' stock price now is telecommunications,"
Fleischer insists. "How can you tell what it's worth? Do you value it
like Qwest, a telecom company also building a fiber-optic network,
which went from $25 at its IPO last spring and has been trading
around $75? No one will know what telecom is worth until we see
what Williams can make of it."

But Weaver sees some clues from last year. "The company didn't
suffer much at the hands of analysts," she explains. "Every quarter,
it turned in disappointing earnings and no one seemed to care!
Analysts can be very forgiving, especially when it comes to
expensive start-ups like fiber optics."
Telecom could
become a major
contributor to
Williams' bottom
line as soon as 1998
or 1999.
Williams' first network was sold outright; the current infrastructure
was conceived as a leasing opportunity. "Williams' strategy now is
to become the carriers' carrier," Weaver says. "The company
certainly learned a lot from its first go-round, and once it gets past
absorbing the initial investment in operating costs, Williams will
begin to see tremendous advantages."

The agreement with U S West could add $3 per share to earnings
by 2000, Weaver says. Or things could move a lot faster. "Telecom
could become a major contributor to the bottom line as soon as
1998 or 1999," she says. "It all depends on how quickly Williams
can turn the increase in revenue into profits."

So far this year, investors are betting that Williams will succeed. Its
shares are up 16.7% in 1998 -- 10 percentage points better than the
broad market -- and show no signs of getting stuffed in the pipeline.

Links
Discuss It
Email Roger Hahn
Email the Editors
Product Support

Top

Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. c 1996-98 Microsoft Corporation and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved.

Investor's editorial goal is to provide a forum for investment ideas. Our articles, columns, and other features should
not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any
specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.



To: djane who wrote (1282)3/13/1998 12:52:00 PM
From: djane  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1629
 
Internet rapidly overtaking telephone traffic, MIT scholar finds

freedomforum.org

Internet rapidly overtaking telephone traffic, MIT scholar finds

By Adam Clayton Powell III

3.11.98

The Internet will carry more communications traffic than conventional telephone
voice circuits in the United States by the end of this year.

That startling prediction is the conclusion of research at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology presented last night by David Tennenhouse, an
associate professor at MIT's Laboratory for Computer Science.

Tennenhouse said the shift from conventional voice to "packet switched" data
was occurring far faster than is generally realized by anyone, including the
government and the major telephone companies.

"By the time they (regional Bell telephone companies) react, they may find the
Internet service providers have the traffic,"
he told a forum of the MIT Club of
Washington.

The Internet uses packet-switching technology, which breaks up each
message, whether text, data, audio or video, into "packets." It then routes
those pieces of message across the network, reassembling them at the
receiving end to recreate the original message. It sounds complicated (and it
is), but packet switching provides many advantages over 19th-century telephone
voice circuits. Many of those benefits were unanticipated consequences of the
new Internet technology.

The "eclipse point," at which a new technology has grabbed 90% of the market
from an old technology, has moved forward based on the MIT research,
Tennenhouse said, predicting it would come in less than 10 years.

"If you want to do a 10-year research project," he said, "it's already too late."

The regional Bell companies will keep control of "the last mile" of the nation's
communications network -- the connection to your house -- but Tennenhouse
said the competition for long distance and regional traffic, even voice traffic, may
be wide open.

Internet telephony -- placing voice telephone calls over the Internet -- is just
beginning, Tennenhouse noted, but he said voice calls on the Internet were
"moving very quickly" to replace conventional telephone traffic in markets where
government agreements keep the price of voice telephone calls artificially high,
such as in calling between Israel and the U.S.

"The ultimate shape of the industry is not the technology," he said, "but the
speed with which it is adopted."

And the rate at which the U.S. is racing toward that "eclipse point" could have
profound implications for the U.S. telephone industry.

Revenue from Internet communications may not exceed revenue from voice
telephone calls for another three or four years, said Tennenhouse, "because
data is (priced) cheaper per bit than a telephone call." But by then, when voice
calls may make up 10% or less of traffic, there will be a "very sudden" move to
"shut down the old clunky system," Tennenhouse said.

However, the major Bell regional telephone companies use a 20-year
depreciation schedule for switches and other major capital investments. So
they will still have billions of dollars on their books invested in equipment that
will be out of date.

"By the time you see the writing on the wall, it's done," said Tennenhouse, who
expressed concern for the financial health of at least some of the Bell operating
companies. "I don't think they will all go bankrupt," he said, "but we do have a
bunch of them" that may go out of business.

Tennenhouse is on leave from MIT to direct the Information Technology Office of
the Pentagon's Advanced Research Projects Agency, the agency that
developed the early versions of the Internet.


TOP



WHO WE ARE | SEARCH | NEWSSTAND | THE FORUM