Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ACTM $100 Million Cable Modem Contract with MOT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rob Preuss who wrote (614)	3/12/1998 11:39:00 AM
From: Joseph Beltran	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1250

Bob, If the inventory wasn't stolen, then how did the shortfall occur? Did it simply vanish? If it wasn't stolen then it must either have been sold, somehow destroyed, or it must still be there, in which case there must be some way to account for it physically. What greenlaw has told you appears to be inconsistent with what the company said in its press release which referred to the issue of insurance. Insurance would come into play if the inventory was stolen or otherwise destroyed by some calamity, i.e. fire. any thoughts?