Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: roro who wrote (4382)	3/12/1998 1:26:00 PM
From: Jesse	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7966

All: Here's another map from Troymin-- a drift thickness map, across Ashton's claims and theirs (again showing estim'd targets, Ashton kimbies, etc): troymin.com Cheers, -j :>

To: roro who wrote (4382)	3/12/1998 1:36:00 PM
From: Famularo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7966

Roro! Pure Gold is using the same person from AEC re identifying anomolies. Which is extremely positive. BTW your comment about changing the name would not just be based on my comment/suggestion made on the Pure Gold thread is it? For the others, I had suggested that Pure Gold should have changed their name to Pure Diamonds during the time of the reverse split. Rumour has it that they are looking at the name again and no decision has been made if they will change the name or what name they will use. Pure Diamond Minerals sounds nice. What you think?