Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : America On-Line: will it survive ...? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (8780)	3/12/1998 3:32:00 PM
From: jack rand	Respond to of 13594

>>Should be worth a hundred points or so, give or take ;-) You're about 48 hours behind. That was up and seen by The Street two days ago. Apart from slam dunk inaccuracies, it's such an obvious puff piece that it defeats the purpose of puff. AOL PR tried too hard and succeeded. Not to mention that being on the cover of Fortune is second only to being on Business Week's.

To: Sam who wrote (8780)	3/12/1998 11:09:00 PM
From: LoLoLoLita	Respond to of 13594

>>This audience is AOL's most valuable asset, more valuable >>by far than its infrastructure or technology. Let's see, in round numbers it has around 13 M subscribers (w. Compuserve) and a market cap of $14 B. So the audience (the subscribers), are "worth" over $1000 per capita. Wow!

To: Sam who wrote (8780)	3/13/1998 12:14:00 AM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 13594

I bet not! It's the same old ___ or hype. We've heard it before.

To: Sam who wrote (8780)	3/13/1998 9:26:00 AM
From: rhet0ric	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13594

Surprise! AOL Wins. Very interesting article. It confirmed what I already knew: that AOL is a success largely because it has smart marketing people. The big mistake the article made, in my view, is that AOL's competition is not other online services, or Yahoo, or even other ISPs, necessarily. Its real competition is the Internet itself, especially the Web. The author seems to be unable to make important distinctions, like between AOL and the Internet, or between online services and ISPs. His logic goes something like this: the Internet is the playing field; online services are the major players; AOL has beaten all the other online services; therefore, AOL has won the day on the Internet. Now, let's turn that around, on the assumption that AOL and the Internet are competitors. In this light, the Internet is growing vastly faster. Its technology is better. The Web (www.anything.com) is more pervasively marketed than AOL as a brand. The Web is more competitive. AOL and the Internet are only somewhat compatible. While AOL has an advantage in that AOL users can browse the Web, but ISP Web users can't browse AOL, the Web/Internet is outpacing AOL at such a rate that it's a moot point. And AOL users can't browse the Web as quickly or reliably as ISP-based users. The Internet is also benefitting from massive spending by every sector of every industry. AOL is stuck in a niche market, home users, with zero chance of capturing other markets. Relatively little of other markets' money is finding its way to AOL. And the big, big danger looming on the horizon is that the Web/Internet may develop in such a way that it is no longer compatible with AOL. When/if that happens, AOL would be lucky to trade at $2. With this view in mind, we could turn the "AOL wins" headline on its ass and say, instead: "AOL is the last loser: it is the last remaining online service to fall before the Internet onslaught." rhet0ric