To: Miki who wrote (6796 ) 3/12/1998 6:12:00 PM From: the Chief Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10836
Miki. If you truly have been reading this thread for the last while you would have realized that it has got much better in the last week. You said:Opinions should be only welcomed if they are based upon the analyzation and presentation of concrete data. How do you propose to obliterate the "other opinions"? Who determines whether the data is concrete? Where, other than "Ven Supreme court rulings" have you seen ANY concrete data? Remember the data being presented in any thread is by nature a collision- "two sides tend to attract". It is in most part conjecture, subjective, objective, defensive, offensive, possessive, and pointed. When opposing sides have "vested interest" it does tend to cause criticism of both. You said:The problem is that people are expressing their emotion-based opinions day after day, hour after hour. It's pathetic and ineffective. Please, if you can, find another thread that has as many diversified personalities as this thread and show me, "that" thread does not fall into the same emotion based opinion? You said:I think you should all be ashamed of yourselves; you know who you are. Feeling ashamed is counter productive. Nobody should feel ashamed, everybody should just realize they got sucked into the vortex and move on. Feeling "ashamed" is dead air space, it serves no constructive purpose. You said:Please help keep this thread environment clean of wasteful posts. It takes too much darn time to search for the ones worth reading. By admission, you state you are a lurker. If you wish change to a thread, or for that matter anything in your life, "you have to participate"! This info also applies to the fellow that "dittoed" Miki's message the Chief