SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alfonso Agostino who wrote (4396)3/12/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: Jesse  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7966
 
Alfie, read the last release again, m'friend! ;) Here's an excerpt from it:
_______________________
"Analyses by dense media separation of samples weighing 3.55
tonnes from six core drill holes on kimberlite K-5 recovered
no diamonds. On the other hand, analysis of a sample of 4.0
tonnes from a pit on K-5 has recovered 0.027 carat of
diamonds greater than 0.8 millimetre in maximum dimension.
The greatest dimensions of the three largest stones are 1.67,
1.24 and 1.20 millimetres.
Although the diamond content of
the sample is low, it is of interest because of the very
large size of kimberlite K-5 and leaves open the possibility
that some portion of the kimberlite may have higher counts."
----------------------

-remember the anomaly is huuuge.
I can email you a mag. graphic of it as an attachment if you'd like.

BTW, Alf, here's a link with some more good TA books mentioned:
Message 3613600

Regards,
-j
:>



To: Alfonso Agostino who wrote (4396)3/12/1998 4:49:00 PM
From: Famularo  Respond to of 7966
 
Al, it could have been the way the drill was positioned/direction. It seems to me it warrants further exploration.