Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (9847)	3/12/1998 5:13:00 PM
From: Neal davidson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Richard, I just do not see why you constantly present the desert dirts as a zero sum game. Naxos can succeed and so can the companies in which you own stock. Must you bash naxos in order for chip or maxam to succeed? I do not think so. Rather, you seem like the school yard bully who thinks that putting others down will make you seem bigger and better. I simply do not think that rationale has any validity, either in the school yard or the desert dirt arena. Neal

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (9847)	3/12/1998 5:14:00 PM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Richard No my pom poms dont feel attacked. The reality is, that Naxos has more certified results than gpgi and Maxam. You can bet what the results will or will not show, and what is "in the works" but nobody else give credence to that. Claims of tonnage and property and economic viability do not matter. Certified results matter. Nothing else. The rest is hyberbole. Both Naxos and Maxam should be into production at some point this year, the results of which will give us hard proof of claims that either will or will not pan out. That is what matters. It is impressive that Naxos can get results from holes a little over 1 mile apart to a depth of 250 feet. It does not mean that there is gold in between those holes. The 250 hole drill program will go a long way towards the determination of that. Not our respective opinions. Mark

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (9847)	3/13/1998 10:06:00 AM
From: Tom Frederick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Richard, I can see that you are hot on GPGI and that is great. I wish you well. I believe in Naxos for very real, very practical reasons. I have done over three years of DD and have made up my mind. Unless something comes up which clearly paints a different picture of Naxos than what has been presented so far, I am following this to the end just as you are following GPGI. As Kim has pointed out with real world examples, this property MAY prove up to be up to 5 times larger than what is currently the "largest" in the world. AND, the metal concentrations are sufficient, based on examples around the world, to be profitable. And with this size deposit, the profits will be enormous. If you have a specific example or specific reason that contradicts the real world examples Kim has outlined, then please share them. Otherwise, I am at a loss as to your motivations for continuous jabbing at those who support this stock. Good luck to you and GPGI Tom F.