Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Random Walk who wrote (9863)	3/12/1998 8:38:00 PM
From: JMB55	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Over the past few years I've read several debates over assay methods here on SI. It seems to me that many individuals from these debates stated the Standard Fire Assay was what the industry deemed the standard process for arriving at metal numbers. Today's announcement states "...Indicating Significant Standard Lead Fire Assay Results for Gold at the Company's Franklin Lake Property". The Jan. 12th release concluded with "All results are by lead fire assay". My guess is the Jan. 12th release numbers used an assay method with some modification to it, resulting in the higher numbers. Today's release indicates to me that Naxos utilized the boiler-plate standard process, the Standard Lead Fire Assay, the industry standard, the real thing (ok, ok) in presenting the new numbers to the mkt. I think this is a good thing. C'mon, we're saying Standard Lead Fire Assay here. Isn't that what has needed to be stated? Any feedback appreciated, thanks. Student Jack