Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jamie Orr who wrote (6089)	3/13/1998
From: pitchlyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Jamie..................... Have some candy!

To: Jamie Orr who wrote (6089)	3/13/1998 12:07:00 AM
From: PsycProf	Respond to of 27968

Thanks for the input Jaime. Oh, we also believe you about recovering your losses. Is that losses from what you invested or from what it could be worth now? Would you like us to send you and your pal Little Engine a post-card from the SI-FAMHily tropical vacation?

To: Jamie Orr who wrote (6089)	3/13/1998 12:10:00 AM
From: JIN CHUN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

Jamie, or is that your real name? No offense, but that question is certainly legitimate. Let me say this first: THIS IS NOT A REVERSE SPLIT If you think that it is, than you are wrong. Yes, the effect may be the same thing as a reverse, being that the number of shares that one has now will be reduced by a 4:1 ration. But think of what a reverse split actually is, and go back and read Brad's post. Once again, THIS IS NOT A REVERSE SPLIT. It was stated that the Myriad deal will be inked next week. They have hired an industry veteran in IT as VP for their IT initiative. The Miami office is opening. They have contracts with AIG, Kemper, Colonial, Deloitte and Touche, Allied Signal, etc. ( read the header ). It is inconceivable to me that they would not be able to at the very least make .10 eps with the current share count of 40MM (pre-merger), in '98. If you think that they can't, please tell me how. FAMH is not fairly valued now because of the exchange they are in. If one were to apply fair market valuations to the current company, minimum price would be around $3. Once they are in a bigger exchange, they will be fairly valued. Once again, FAIRLY VALUED!, that means we won't have to put up with the #!#$! of this exchange. What does that mean for those who are shareholders? A much higher stock price. FAIR MARKET VALUATIONS FOR FAMH = MUCH HIGHER SHARE PRICE Jamie, or whoever, tell me how this is a run of the mill reverse. Show it to me, I challenge you. By the way, it is exceedingly easy for one to have multiple accounts with multiple monikers. Tell me what the share price is fairly valued in your opinion, and tell me why. Tell me why FAMH isn't worth more than what it is now. Jin.

To: Jamie Orr who wrote (6089)	3/13/1998 12:24:00 AM
From: carolm	Respond to of 27968

Jamie, Ira stated in one of the early conference calls that the EPS was based on REOCCURRING revenues.

To: Jamie Orr who wrote (6089)	3/13/1998 1:21:00 AM
From: dexx	Respond to of 27968

Jamie Orr, I don't believe you are credible and I don't believe you are who you say you are. I also don't believe your story of loss and, now, recent recovery of your losses. If you are not Little Engine, you are just like him, and therefore worthy of being ignored. You conveniently pop in here when things are looking better than ever (in my opinion) for FAMH. If all of us who are long on FAMH sink, we sink, but if we win, we win BIG. So please leave us alone. We are enjoying our hopes and dreams. With that said, I will now ignore you. Dexx