Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Famularo who wrote (4427)	3/13/1998 12:41:00 PM
From: ddl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7966

Good point Frank and correct me if I'm wrong... I feel that mini-bulks are the equivalent of drilling and hitting gold. 500t+ bulk samples are the equivalent of expanding your drilling to define the size of the gold anomaly. In both cases, if things turn out good, then all that's left is feasibility for a mine. IMHO, if Ashton verifies some of the c/t counts we have then I feel feasibility will result in opening a mine simply because of the cost in BF is way lower than in the NWT. Also, gold juniors announcing gold finds are not moving too fast these days due to BRX. Even after feasibility they move slowly. But with ACA, if they verify one Kimberlite with perhaps, lets say, 35c/t, then because of the size of these mothers, one can produce a mine. Hang on folks, because if these large bulks pan out, ACA is going much higher. Good action... What's up Frank? - denis