SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ISLAND-ARC RESOURCES IAR-VSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Fix who wrote (92)3/19/1998 5:17:00 PM
From: Ed Pakstas  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186
 
Drilling to start at Back Lake diamond project

Island-Arc Resources Corporation IAR
Shares issued 8,583,285 Mar 17 close $0.50
Wed 18 Mar 98 News Release
Mr Lawrence Barr reports
The following information has been received from Island-Arc's Back Lake
diamond project joint venture partner, SouthernEra Resources. Island-Arc
has a 10.62% carried interest in the Back Lake diamond project.
The primary focus of the Back Lake diamond exploration project since
November 1997 has been to locate the primary kimberlite source of the
ice-transported Yuryi kimberlite float material discovered on the shore of
Munn Lake during August 1997.
The Yuryi kimberlite float material is within a 150m diameter area with
some of the larger pieces of kimberlite being in the 10 to 20m diameter
range. There is also a strong development of kimberlite mud along the Munn
Lake shoreline.
Microdiamond testing of the Yuryi kimberlite float material has returned
226 diamonds from 581kg of treated kimberlite. Sixty-two diamonds are
greater than 0.5mm in their largest dimension, with one 0.12, one 0.03 and
three 0.01 carat diamonds being recovered. Overall, the majority of the
diamonds are clear and colourless.
Kimberlite indicator microprobe chemistry results from the Yuryi kimberlite
indicate that 41% of the 50 pyrope garnets probed lie within the G10 field
and 6 of the 49 chromites probed have diamond inclusion chemistries.
The program to date has located 12 kimberlite dykes that occur in the
vicinity of the Yuryi kimberlite float area. However, a comparison of the
chromite microprobe chemistry between the chromites hosted by the
kimberlite dykes and the chromites hosted within the Yuryi kimberlite float
material suggest that they are not related. The chromites from the
kimberlite dykes have a 2% to 3% higher TiO2 value than the chromites that
occur within the Yuryi kimberlite.
During November and December 1997 a 175 line km picked grid was established
covering the up-ice area of the Yuryi kimberlite float location. This was
followed by the completion of a magnetometer survey, horizontal loop and
time domain electromagnetic surveys, a bathymetry survey (lake bottom
depth) and the collection of 180 lake bottom sediment geochemical samples
at 100m centres.
The above surveys have delineated approximately 16 targets that could be
the result of kimberlite pipe intrusions. A total of five depth depressions
have been defined with corresponding anomalous lake bottom sediment
geochemical results that are high in chromium, titanium, niobium, nickel,
magnesium, uranium and rubidium which are suggestive of a kimberlite
source.
A number of high priority ground EM targets occur up-ice of the Yuryi
kimberlite float area with one particularly strong coincident time domain
EM-47 and horizontal loop electromagnetic conductivity anomaly that is
approximately 400m by 150m in dimension.
Diamond drilling to test the 16 various anomalies will commence during the
first week of April. A total of 2,000m of drilling is expected to be
completed by the end of May.
Approximately 1,200 of the 1,700 till samples collected during 1997 have
been processed for the recovery of kimberlite indicator mineral gains. The
till sampling program was designed to further define six kimberlite
indicator trains that occur within the property. Interpretation of the new
results is continuing. From March to the end of May 1998 approximately 300
line km of magnetometer and horizontal loop surveys will be completed to
locate the primary kimberlite source of the above mineral trains. In
addition, approximately 1,000 further lake bottom sediment geochemical
samples will be collected and bathymetry surveys will be completed covering
lakes of interest.
To date, approximately $4 million has been spent on exploration with $1.7
million expended during 1997. The exploration budget for 1998 is expected
to be $1.1 million.
(c) Copyright 1998 Canjex Publishing Ltd. canada-stockwatch.com