Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Avalon Group, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chad Beemer who wrote (352)	3/14/1998 3:01:00 PM
From: Jon Matz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1530

Chad every company shares more good news than bad news with the public, that's the nature of man. But to refuse to share anything publicly good or bad is down right negligent. Especially if the only delay is motivated by the desire to rocket the stock to valuations that it can't possibly sustain. I'll go on record here to say exactly what I believe and what I plan to do if and when this stock soars to a multiple of it's current valuation. I am not a wealthy individual and only hold 3,000 share of AVAL at a cost basis of about $.36. I will exit this stock after such a rise in value and reevaluate it's potential after reviewing in depth the companies business plan. If the story is compelling enough and if the stock falls below a reasonable valuation, I may buy in again for a long term investment. But I now firmly believe that anyone that holds this stock for too long will be waiting for at least a year or more (if ever) to regain the peak valuation it will attain if Lance does what he does best. I came to this conclusion by looking at the stocks that you claimed Lance promoted. If there is other information available that will provide the thread with details that help to discount this theory of mine, then I hope Bernard or his superiors (not you) provides us with it and soon! I am aware that what I have stated, if believed by anyone, will have the probable impact of reducing the upside potential of this stock by at least a few percentage points. I have spoken up because that's who I am, I make no apology beyond the provisions I've placed already in earlier posts. If Bernard can't release news before next Friday for any reason he should tell the thread. He may call me and I would be delighted to quote him in a post, but not without weighing his comments against what I have already said. Cheers, Jon