Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pat mudge who wrote (39152)	3/14/1998 1:51:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 61433

*********OT******* Mattel sues magazines for explicit photos of Barbie, Ken Reuters Story - March 13, 1998 17:57 %US %BUS %ENT %DE %GB %JP %NEWS MAT VO.TO 7201.T V%REUTER P%RTR By Sue Zeidler LOS ANGELES, March 13 (Reuters) - Barbie is having her day in court. And another. And another. And another. The world's most famous doll, made by Calif.-based Mattel Inc., is right at home in this sprawling city where everyone sues everybody over everything from slander to breach of contract to stealing your idea for a screenplay. The plastic bombshell, who celebrated her 39th birthday Monday, has been in court more than she's been out as Mattel spends mountains of money on legal fees to vigorously defend Barbie's $2 billion-a-year trademarked product and "wholesome" image. The latest legal brouhaha involves London magazine "For Him" and the German version of a U.S. periodical "Men's Health" which used "Ken" and "Barbie" models to show a variety of sexual positions - and had Mattel turning somersaults. In a federal lawsuit filed in Los Angeles last week, Mattel said it has worked hard since 1959 to preserve the image and identity of the Barbie line, which is portrayed by Mattel as wholesome and aspirational and is never associated with anything obscene, vulgar or distasteful. Mattel said the publishers infringed in 1996 articles, which contained photos of Ken and Barbie arranged in various explict sexual positions. "For Him", which originally ran the article in April 1996, also put an animated version on its Web site and followed up in later issues with Ken and Barbie in other lewd acts, Mattel said. The German edition of "Men's Health" reprinted the article in August 1996 with the same photos. "These publishing companies have been using images of our product for their own commercial benefit," said Sean Fitzgerald, a spokesman for Mattel. "We're committed to aggressively protecting the Barbie brand and all brands that are critical to Mattel," he said. Wolfgang Breuer, deputy editor for Germany's "Men's Health" magazine said the magazine has not received any notification of a lawsuit against it and has only heard about it through the media. "We were rather surprised to hear about this because we thought we had portrayed Barbie in a rather light-hearted way and not at all in a disreputable way," Breuer said. "We have not received any charges," he said, speaking from the magazine's editorial in Hamburg. Meanwhile, Mattel just had a setback in a similar suit in Los Angeles against MCA records, a unit of Seagram Co. Ltd. , over pop band Agua's song "Barbie Girl." In that suit, filed last September, Mattel was seeking a preliminary injunction to enjoin MCA from distributing the song, which it said contained lyrics that "associate sexual and other unsavory themes with Barbie. But the judge didn't agree. "Even if the song were considered vulgar as Mattel purports, it is a parody of the 'party-girl' image Barbie may already have among some members of the general public," U.S. District Judge William Matthew Byrne wrote in a 33-page ruling filed in February in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles. "Absent stronger evidence that the song actually tarnishes Barbie's image, plaintiff is unlikely to succeed on its trademark dilution claims," he said. Mattel's Fitzgerald said the suit is far from over. "We really believe we have a strong suit," he said. The legendary doll and pop icon has rarely been out of the news lately. Late last year, Mattel announced Barbie would be getting plastic surgery to get a more politically correct body than her superhuman proportions, causing a near-riot among her most devoted fans. Mattel has also sued Japanese carmaker Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. for a TV ad featuring dolls resembling G.I. Joe, Barbie and her boyfriend Ken in September. The lawsuit, also filed in federal court in Los Angeles, seeks an injunction to keep the spot from airing and damages and costs against Nissan for causing "irreparable injury to Mattel's name, business reputation and good will." Fitzgerald said discussions with Nissan are ongoing. Mattel also has sued San Francisco artist Ken Hansen and Miller's Report, a magazine for Barbie collectors. "They're spending a lot of legal money to control Barbie's trademark and they have a right to do that," said Brian Eisenbarth, analyst with Collins & Co. "But the fact that people are using Ken and Barbie all the time just shows the incredible brand recognition they have," he said, adding, "they may just have to come to the realization that the Barbie name is synonomous with a lot of things."