Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doug Shapiro who wrote (6851)	3/15/1998 3:38:00 PM
From: Gary Nash	Respond to of 10836

Doug: The transfer form Dot de Lemon to Torres as payment for her outstanding legal bills was performed by PROXY as stated in the first ruling. If the POA was an issue, she would have had to file a notice within 5 judicial days to deny the transfer, which she did not. The proxy followed by no objection therefore acknowledges that she permitted the transfer before she died. LC 4&6 therefore did NOT pass intestate and the CVG did not have any claim on an unclaimed estate of Dot. Hence, the govt. actions which deal with her "unclaimed estate in LC 4&6" are without merit, which I am sure the PAC will eventually dissect and rule upon. The manner in which the PAC sailed through the first ruling is an eye-opener; read and re-read it carefully to appreciate how they think and resolve the issues. Also, in the second ruling, they quickly dispensed with the BS that Mael's first attorney was presenting; he was trying to have the first ruling reversed-must have been bribed? Gary.