SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ACRT about to move to new highs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Pink who wrote (3380)3/15/1998 10:19:00 PM
From: Doug R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7054
 
Let's compare statements, shall we?

A. "Lizzy "20-20" Melnik worked as a book keeper for a seeing eye dog foundation."

B. "...does bookeeping (sic) for seeing eye dogs."

Obviously, statement B was a lie and meant to mislead.

A. "... president of a gambling school."

B. "... an ex-gambling instructor."

Again, here in statement B we see a lie with intent to mislead.

Geez, I'll stop there. 2 blatant examples should be enough. Now, when you say you don't lie, you are lying. If you are lying and misleading you are obviously of poor character and not to be trusted...even by your own minions whom I would expect you to stab in the back for a few dollars. If you keep them shorting into an intractable position while you cover, I wouldn't be at all surprised.

Doug R



To: Mr. Pink who wrote (3380)3/15/1998 11:10:00 PM
From: Andrew Q. Viet  Respond to of 7054
 
Pink does not lie when he says he's not telling the truth.



To: Mr. Pink who wrote (3380)3/15/1998 11:40:00 PM
From: Jean-Philippe Chevalier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7054
 
Mr. Pink,

I read the comments of Mr. Buffett that you linked to us from Berkshire Hathaway. Mr. Buffett's wisdom rings true. You have provided a service to the regulars here as well as to the billions of lurkers that casually happen across this thread every day. Although it is a bit lengthy for the weak of heart, I recommend everyone read his comments and make their own investment decision.

In summary, what I concluded is that the market will properly value Actrade in the end. Failure to properly report financial conditions or to under insure the business risks may add to the share price during this dead cat bounce, however, the market will surely price Actrade near your current evaluation of a share value of somewhere under $6. Therefore, the greater the stock price rise over the next few days, the better the value that can be obtained by shorting the stock. The greatest financial reward will come to he who is best able to calculate the restitution coefficiency of the dead cat.

To be forewarned is to be forearmed. As His wisdom is reinforced by the words of Mr. Buffett, and as such is now posted for all to read, anyone who shorts this stock should not feel guilty of securing the proceeds of those who are foolishly invested. Do you agree?

Thanks again for your service to all investors who care to partake of your wisdom. Welcome back.

Don



To: Mr. Pink who wrote (3380)3/16/1998 9:40:00 AM
From: Z man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7054
 
YOU Do LIE AND YOU ADMITTED IT, We have been over this time and again.You stated "TAD's are unenforceable by law".( your post #1142 ) which law makes them unenforceable. Your post #1116 "The company is carrying on nefarious activities". What nefarious activities pinky boy . You were told STAY OFF this thread until you prove these are not lies.