Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tanoose who wrote (6874)	3/15/1998 10:49:00 PM
From: Syncrude	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Frank, your effort to educate Valentine et al is a brave one. However, there are people who are not interested in facts. They come around here trying to sound informed, but in fact have done no research and it shows. I guess this person in another one seeking attention, with little to contribute. No matter what information you post, they will ignore it and remain in the comfort of the PDG party line. Their only purpose is to try and scare investors. Current KRY shareholders should understand the situation by now. There is nothing new since quite some time, so the situation is unchanged in terms of a position in KRY. Each should always set their own targets in accordance with their tolerance to risk and investment objectives. KRY is a specualtive stock as there is no guarantee on the outcome of the next Supreme Court ruling (success or content). To try and compare it to IBM is nonsense. This being said, KRY shareholders know why they bought. Funny that those who have no interest in KRY short or long, come here and try to preach on something they obviously know very little about, and on top of that insult management and shareholders alike!

To: tanoose who wrote (6874)	3/15/1998 11:02:00 PM
From: Valentine	Respond to of 10836

Hey fellas. Did MO say that the other three motions were accepted by the court on their merit and would go to trial, or that the court has accepted the appeal of the non-admittance decision? Big difference boys. Now how about reality. The court is now reviewing the appeal which they "accepted". They must accept an appeal. This is what they do. They reach a decision at the admittance phase and a non-admittance is appealable by law. They then must accept the appeal to this non-admittance decision. They review the first decision and respond to the appeal. This second decision on admittance is without appeal. Assuming admission, discovery and a trial would follow, probably taking years. This is how a Supreme Court works. They cannot make it up as they go along as the MO version goes. It is laughable to think that a SC made a decision on admittance and then changed it 1 week later. Anybody that believes this deserves to lose money. Assuming the initial non-admission decision stands, GAME OVER. KRY goes to zero. Cheers.