SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mark[ox5] who wrote (6602)3/16/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: JOEY  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27968
 
where the heck are all these shares coming from at .65?



To: Mark[ox5] who wrote (6602)3/16/1998 12:41:00 PM
From: skreiger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27968
 
Correct me if I'm wrong. Despite the fact that NASDAQ is a market maker system, isn't there quite a bit more accountability demanded of MM's because of the presence of the brokers and other institutional buyers involved -- folks who don't frequent BB stocks. It seems if a MM were to mess around with share prices when an influential brokerage house was involved, that MM would not be long for the game. That's why the MM's here do not like to lose good stocks to the bigger exchanges. They know a good stock when they see (and trade) it.

JMO

Scott



To: Mark[ox5] who wrote (6602)3/16/1998 12:43:00 PM
From: Freddie Forte  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27968
 
Hey gang...I understand Nasdaq is a market maker system. However, the MM'S on the OTC can paint the tape at any time. I've tested this theory numerous times with small buys and these mm's are definitely thieves. They walk the price up and down at will with no correspondence to legitimate supply and demand. Nasdaq should at least level the playing field somewhat, and our stock will be fairly valued.