Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (4611)	3/16/1998 1:12:00 PM
From: john patinskas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6980

Dear JDN: I have bought this stock on dips so many times that I feel like a duck. The market is telling me that BAY and I are dead ducks. Good Luck, JOHN {we are going to need it}

To: JDN who wrote (4611)	3/16/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: Bosco	Respond to of 6980

Dear John - you and me both. I think this is a classical case of long squeeze. I m still holding - it helps not to have margin outstanding - despite the ugliness of the pattern. While [I hope] this is a temporary situation, I think whoever doing the selling know what they are doing. Since this month is crucial to the quarterly result, they have the specialists cornered. I doubt that there are too many specialists sticking their necks out. rgds Bosco

To: JDN who wrote (4611)	3/16/1998 3:58:00 PM
From: B.K. Ohneis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6980

<<Dear Bosco: ERICY is great company to be in bed with. They, IMHO, are the leading R & D firm in their field. I have owned their stock for a long time and not only have done well but am impressed with their management>> agreed. i simply don't understand why people are selling although BAY has been sending out good news these few days. Beats. Any idea about whether the in bed thing may become a merger? rumor has it that ERICY has been looking out for a network co. to buy. BAY would be a strong candidate for them. Any rumor to confirm that?