To: Riley G who wrote (44052 ) 3/16/1998 10:23:00 PM From: Hawkmoon Respond to
Riley, However, any information that has not been publicly relayed via press releases or SEC filings seems to be "taboo" as well and is considered by regulators as an example of a select group of investors receiving what should be publicly available to one and all. would be willing to tell them should they choose to call to inquire. We were not interested in passing on inside information that had a material impact and I did not receive copies of press releases in advance. What we did want was information that would better help us to understand the technical and business aspects of the company.initially inquired into that company because of the frequency of postings on the internet by its shareholders, as well as the belief that our little group constituted a private information network not available to the public at large (yes, I know that SI is publicly available to everyone with a Modem, but the regulators don't subscribe to that belief.) And we all know that once they start turning over individual "rocks", that they will inevitably discover discrepancies that they will then claim that justified their halting the stock. (I feel they have a lot of pressure on them to do this in order to justify the original halt)not relay the specifics of those conversations here on a public network that is obviously being monitored and recorded . What will be, will be, with regard to RMIL. Its future is solely in the hands of its management and their ability to meet the requirements of the SEC and NASD for them to resume trading and achieve the promised financing.
