SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: B.K. Ohneis who wrote (4662)3/16/1998 7:43:00 PM
From: Ken Twining  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6980
 
B.K. Ohneis:
He, Phil Orlando of Value Line Investments. said this after the market close today. He even stated the stock has been weak and now trading between 26 and 27, mainly due to worries over Asia. Value Line isn't Gospel, but I have found them to be quite accurate and quite reliable and they give the highest rating to BAY a number of 1. All the Best. -kt.



To: B.K. Ohneis who wrote (4662)3/17/1998 8:22:00 AM
From: Wallace Rivers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6980
 
I am long Bay, but, not to disagree with Mr. Orlando, but just to show what CAN occur, I remember seeing some talking head on CNBC saying that one of his best picks was MOT. A day or two afterwards, the company preannounced, and the stock lost about 7%. Not to compare MOT with BAY (Mr. House is a FAR superior CEO IMHO to his MOT cousin), and BAY has been discounted severely already in anticipation of some less than positive news (again, my judgment), but these so-called "experts" can miss the mark.



To: B.K. Ohneis who wrote (4662)3/17/1998 2:03:00 PM
From: eric podell  Respond to of 6980
 
Don't know if he said it before or after but Phil Orlando loves tech stocks, his analysis is usually run of the mill and his favorite expression is "I would be an aggressive buyer of Intel, Compaq, Cisco etc. Watched him for years and he never gave any hint of the tech wreck risks that were just around the corner. However, this time he's right. :)