Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CellularVision (CVUS): 2-way LMDS wireless cable. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James Fink who wrote (1552)	3/17/1998 9:57:00 AM
From: Frank Duda	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2063

In retrospect can anyone imagine what this stock would be doing if CVUS had bid in the auction? The cash situation seems to be bad enough now, think about what it could have been. But by the grace of someone shareholders were spared that. I hope CVUS is gracious enough to respond to Bernard Levy's letter. As investors we deserve at least that much courtesy. The silent treatment is really starting to bug me, in a large way.

To: James Fink who wrote (1552)	3/17/1998 10:56:00 AM
From: Karl Schwarszchild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2063

Fink, According to your posts on Yahoo!, you recently closed your CVUS position (at or near the stock's all-time low - a quite unbrilliant move, in my opinion). So seeing as you are no longer a CVUS investor, I was wondering: is it really necessary for you to linger here putting negative spin on anything and everything under the sun concerning this company day after day? I realize of course that having been booted from the SI Winstar thread for offenses similar to those committed here you must be feeling frustrated. (The loss on your WCII short must also be bothering you.) Still, that doesn't give you the right to dump on CVUS twice as much. ... Honestly, I am extremely tired of the "all-Fink, all the time" format and tone of this forum. The way Fink rams investing dictates down throats while trashing the company is so un-cool. For some perspective on Fink's tactics, I strongly recommend that one also consult a few of Fink's much more classic and liberal CVUS posts on Yahoo!. Of course, on Yahoo!, Fink is believed to employ a number of usernames, so one can never be quite sure if it is him or not. Also, there is no assurance that he will continue to post there seeing as he promised to stop posting there when he reported selling his shares. Of course, he returned to Yahoo! to defecate on the company once more within two days of that promise.