To: Steven Angelil who wrote (6741 ) 3/17/1998 9:38:00 AM From: John Fairbanks Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27968
I was talking to my Dad last night about the audit... he used to do audits in his early days with the accounting firm and he said what we are seeing here is completely understandable. For those who might have as little understanding of the audit process as I did, here it is... Typically the audit will begin in December with the auditors overseeing the closing of the year. The they begin a time of field work where they actually go and verify things like account receiveables, debts, pending legal issues, etc. The day the field work is complete becomes the "date of the audit". On that day, although the audit is still far from complete, all of the numbers have been finalized. (Corporate tax returns were due yesterday, so end of year audits would have been at least completed to this point so they can use the numbers in their tax returns.) The auditors then begin a time of writing up the audit from their rough worksheets. Footnotes are made to clarify how numbers were calculated such as an explaination of how an asset is being depreciated, etc. The auditors are also responsible for explaining any siginificant changes such as changes in business structure that have occurred between the end of the audit (Dec 31) and the audit date (when they finished the field work). I suspect that this is what has been slowing us down because the company has been changing at a million miles a minute and all of that needs to be carefully documented. Since Ira gave us the final numbers a couple of weeks ago, that was probably the date that the field work was finished and the auditors have been working since putting the audit together, but the numbers are finalized! He said that FAMH is actually right on schedule for what he would expect to see an audit for 1997.