Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas G. Busillo who wrote (30527)	3/17/1998 12:35:00 PM
From: Richard Russell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

Tom and all, Does cnbc have a web site or email address for discussion or "sharing" viewers opinions, maybe even a phone number where one could get through and bring this to their attention, as if they will care. RR

To: Thomas G. Busillo who wrote (30527)	3/17/1998 1:50:00 PM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 53903

Tom: I hope the CNBC crew sees you excellent comments. Those comments are right on the money. Unfortunately, I doubt that they would understand the message. Well put. I agree with you that they are doing a total disservice to investors with their biased "reporting". Best, Earlie

To: Thomas G. Busillo who wrote (30527)	3/18/1998 11:20:00 AM
From: John Graybill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

The eternal question is, is it simple laziness as well? Note that you had to read as far as the fifth sentence before actually seeing the -0.26 operating loss explicitly stated. You would have had to read as far as the second line to see the mention of the 1-time gain. When you see (as I did) Bob Pisani saying -- twice, as usual -- a few days ago that "the Dow has never closed above 6000" when he meant 8600, you lose faith in their ability to even read what's in front of them.