To: RODNEY R. BORDELON who wrote (4989 ) 3/17/1998 4:00:00 PM From: tech Respond to of 10786
No matter how much you try to fill up this thread with your hand holding and coddling statements, the facts are the facts and you DID admit to some of them this a.m.ALYD may not have shown a profit yet thru ALL of 1997. ALYD expenses may be going up monthly or even daily. ALYD losses may have risen sharply since 1994. BUT, look at many successful companies when they first got started. You start out with serious debt and losses. If you are fortunate/lucky/good business person, hopefully you will make it before you become bankrupt. O.K., Bob Gruder took GEM bankrupt. TECH, do you think Bob Gruder will take ALYD into bankruptcy? If you do, your out of your mind. - THE TRUTH. I had a good laugh when I read this.... 1. You ADMIT that ALYD may not even show a profit through all of 1997, although the company reported in the preliminary Q4 results, that they showed a profit. Why do you think "slick" bob didn't combine the domestic and international sales. I also find it very troubling how Gruder was quoted in the Charlotte Business Journal as saying "we are profitable now" back in Q2 when ALYD hasn't even shown a profit in all of 1997. 2. You also ADMIT that ALDY's losses have been increased sharply since 1994. So when you and others, like Jeff Mitchell, throw out all kind of revenue numbers you fail to say that those revenues have only added up to losses. 3. You also ADMIT that Bob took GEM to bankruptcy. The company has failed to meet any of its own revenue estimates. "Slick" has also put out so many over the top projections that he is look at as a joke. He told the Business Journal they were profitable when they were not, he didn't combine the international and domestic numbers for ALYD, so he could say they made a small profit. Word games and misleading will only get you so far. your fearless leader in action, hope he does better with ALYD than he did with GEM. your buddy, Tech.