Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Clarke who wrote (2964)	3/17/1998 7:11:00 PM
From: bob	Respond to of 4736

NOT IF YOU KEEP SCREAMING AT ME!!!!

To: Kevin Clarke who wrote (2964)	3/17/1998 7:51:00 PM
From: ODLAW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4736

I'm new to investing and have only held NAMX since Oct97. No I'm not happy about loosing half my money on paper either but I can't believe anyone would actually make trading decisions based upon these posts. My broker warned me to stay away from these type of stocks and then when it doubled he told me to sell. HE WILL CALL ME AGAIN WHEN IT QUADRUPLES. It's quite frustrating to view negative posts but then again I have to consider the source. Someone with an educated keyboard whom I don't know from ADAM. The question about the number of shares issued is a genuine concern of mine too but I don't understand the float principle and how it affects me. My one goal like yours is to MAKE MONEY. Positive posts and more positive posts are what is needed right now just to keep morale up. I'm not selling until it soars past $3.00 and it will. ODLAW

To: Kevin Clarke who wrote (2964)	3/17/1998 9:24:00 PM
From: SOROS	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4736

I thought I stated my position quite clearly in my previous post. Get straight answers, I'm in. Get avoidance and excuses, makes me stay leery. What is so hard to understand about that? I agree that just being on a thread to "bad-mouth" is uncalled for, and usually there is an ulterior motive (ie - wants to buy back in at a lower price, holds a short position or puts, etc.). Hunter claims his excuse is simply a hatred for a particular person, but you can make your own judgement on that. I really don't care if the price is .01 or 1.00 -- good leadership, straight answers, sound fundamentals and I'm in -- shady dealings, subterfuge, very poor business execution for personal gain and nothing more and I'm never in again. The fact that the longs (of which I was once) simply refuse to press for answers amazes me. I had someone press at one time, and that's why I'm now on the sidelines. If Bob S. or one of you "shareholders" can get the answers my contact could not, I stand to have my mind (and pocketbook) changed. I'd like to make back the money I lost on this stock, but, alas, it seems pointless so far. I will not post again, but I will check back from time to time to see if any of you "shareholders" has the guts to demand and get answers -- or at least inform the thread of what you were told when you did demand some simple, straight answers. It dumbfounds me that reasonably intelligent people are willing to take "no, sorry, can't do that. don't pay attention to the evil shorts and conspirators that are attacking our stock" as ANSWERS for their questions. Even being down in share price should mean nothing compared to getting the truth. And there should be no shame in telling the truth to shareholders.