Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: randmiser who wrote (4082)	3/17/1998 8:21:00 PM
From: aleta	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

randmiser, Call it whatever you want. All I do know is what has happened to other companies he has been involved with. Most have no assets left. They are out of business. If you're happy with his track record then great. What does it matter to you what I think? If you don't want my opinion why ask for it? Aleta

To: randmiser who wrote (4082)	3/17/1998 9:26:00 PM
From: aleta	Respond to of 18444

Now that I've calmed down, I'm going to try and answer you in a reasonable and hopefully polite manner. so in your mind no matter what news netz or esvs has out it will all be bad because hayton is some how in control It doesn't matter what's in my mind. The news itself wasn't bad, but what matters here is how the public perceives these new appointments. With the Wired stories hammering away at execs leaving like rats from a sinking ship and new unknown people coming on board. Too many major changes and people ask questions. Are they leaving because they don't want to be associated with Hayton? This is not good for the NETZ. Is this objective or is this what you call balance. I think being practical about this situation is important too. I'm sorry if it's not what you had hoped to hear, but you did ask my opinion. And that's all it is. Just an opinion.

To: randmiser who wrote (4082)	3/17/1998 10:00:00 PM
From: FTJoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

I call it a personal attack On the flip side, it "appears" that unless a person's opinion agrees with yours, you will ignore or treat as some personal attack. If that is true, you are lost. All info is good, even if it's false it provides information. Otherchap's presence made people think there was a sure winner here and OC was trying to prevent the run-up. If you look back, you'll find where I suggested the presence of someone like that might be a ploy on the part of hypsters to get folks to think just like that. Again, all info is good, interpreting it is the trick, ignoring it is death.