SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : APCO Automobile Protection Company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Froman who wrote (1633)3/17/1998 9:46:00 PM
From: Bruce Russell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3351
 
This Jack M must be one happy dude with his early ride on APCO.



To: Froman who wrote (1633)3/17/1998 10:11:00 PM
From: Dana Merrill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3351
 
<<<But I must contest that Doug or the three Amigos were not the first to bring APCO to everyone's attention. The originator of this thread started this thread due to information mentioned on the Great Stocks list server back in 1996, of which Jack M and myself spoke often. I have been in and out of APCO several times since 1996 and Jack M has been a dyed in the wool believer of APCO since I first noticed his messages on Great Stocks and here. It took over a year longer for many here to realize what some already knew and were waiting for the time to come. But it really doesn't matter who was first as long as it's paying off now.>>>>

Hey! I get to claim the #1 post!! It looks like the originator of this thread is no longer active on SI - hasn't posted since last fall.

I also credit Jack M. for providing consistently valuable info. on APCO since back in 1996. I first got into APCO around $2 back in 1995, added WAY too may shares this past year in the upper $3 range and am still holding them all. Like you say, "it doesn't matter who was first", but it sure is nice to be right in a big way once in a while!

-dam



To: Froman who wrote (1633)3/17/1998 10:28:00 PM
From: Magnatizer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 3351
 
I stand corrected

thanks Fro

David