SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale Stempson who wrote (50534)3/17/1998 11:08:00 PM
From: Naggrachi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
What really bothers me is that there is only one model, a cpq 233, with a built in Zip. Why are we going backwards now? Especially when one considers that there is a Zip-built in ad campaign?

Zead



To: Dale Stempson who wrote (50534)3/17/1998 11:09:00 PM
From: Gary Wisdom  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
I know you won't listen, but here I go anyway . . .

I sold my last shares of Iomega last month at $9 1/4 or so. I took a beating on the stock, NOT the options as some of the arrogant types here seem to think they know.

But, I feel much, much better these days not worrying what the next bomb will drop with this stock. Of course, should it get bought out or spike up unexpectedly, I'll miss out on those gains. But, in the meantime, I have peace of mind.

Worth much more than money.

FWIW.



To: Dale Stempson who wrote (50534)3/18/1998 12:06:00 AM
From: Rocky Reid  Respond to of 58324
 
Re: Herb Greenberg's article

Wow. He do have an ego, don't he?

One can raise an eyebrow at his insistence that Iomega evidently owes him answers to any questions he has, but one cannot look at the price of IOM and say he was wrong.