SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: POLARBEAR who wrote (734)3/18/1998 9:07:00 AM
From: Goalie  Respond to of 7235
 
Hello Polarbear; and thanks for the item on M1. Overall, interesting piece.
Goalie.



To: POLARBEAR who wrote (734)3/18/1998 4:43:00 PM
From: GULL  Respond to of 7235
 
To:POLARBEAR
From:GULL
Marsfontein Farm in situ value of $107 Million and this is just Randgold's 35%!!!
I quote from your extremely interesting article:
"This stunning find gives the M-1 pipe one of the highest reported values per tonne of any known kimberlite in the world.The indicated in-situ value of the M-1 pipe is over $450 per tonne.(685,000 tonnes)
The value of this assett alone is far greater than the current market value of Randgold."
A few discrepancies:
1.In your message to Goalie you state that Randgold could do well without M-1 just as SouthernEra will.
Am I reading the correct report as quoted above?
2.Once again the proverbial attack on the weak case of the 'heirs'
including Mr.Lawyer.
Leave it to the courts to decide this issue.
3.Why no mention of the major change in the upper management of Randgold i.e. the departure of Mr.Flack as Chairman and his replacement by Mr.Kebble?



To: POLARBEAR who wrote (734)3/31/1998 3:48:00 PM
From: GULL  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7235
 
"Randgold 'unlikely' to still be in existence by year end."
Interesting headline in Business Day dated Tuesday March 31 1998.
(www.bday.co.za)
What implications for the Klipspringer Joint Venture?
I re-iterate why was no mention made of the changes to the upper management of Randgold in your in-depth message number 734 and my response number 736?
Do you believe that there will be a changes in the shareholding of the SUF Randgold partnerships?