Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Rolfe who wrote (17840)	3/18/1998 11:53:00 AM
From: Teri Skogerboe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

Steve, Re: "I never said .92 was a positive number in and of itself, only that it was positive compared with the expected .86-.88." I understand that and thought you were partially repeating what CNBC was saying, though that part really doesn't matter. About how long this downturn could last, more and more I come to believe that it could easily be as severe or more so than the '96 slowdown. Why exactly?? in part because PC growth appears to be slowing, losses in the DRAM arena are vast, and pricing power is very limited even for Intel. Intel admitted in their most recent conference call that their lower end Pentiums are now commodity products. I see a period of weak fundamentals and therefore a period of risk, much more than reward. As Aki and others have stated, we take our positions (or hold cash) in accordance with our convictions. As you may be aware, the semi-equips have bottomed in previous downturns at Price/Sales ratios of ~ 1.0, varying somewhat from company to company (e.g. LRCX has tended to bottom at a PSR of ~ .7). Bottom line for me, 1998 could easily be a very rough year for the semi-equips, and the year is young. Just my thoughts, Teri