Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (10486)	3/18/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: W.F. Schwertley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

To All (hold on to your hat, Jerard), The following is a combination of the assay samples of the last two press releases (* indicates today's results): Hole Depth Ledoux & Rocky Mountain Company Geochemical (Au oz/T) (Au oz/T) -------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 25'-50' 0.134 4 25'-50' 0.222 4 150'-175' 0.120 4 150'-175' 0.181 5 25'-50' excluding 30'-35' 0.082 0.024 5 50'-75' excluding 60'-65' 0.079 5 50'-75' excluding 60'-65' 0.105 5 50'-75' excluding 60'-65' 0.146 5 50'-75' excluding 60'-65' 0.227 5 75'-100' 0.024 5 75'-100' 0.198 * 0.198 * 5 125'-150' 0.012 5 125'-150' 0.201 * excluding 130'-135' 0.222 * 5 150'-175' excluding 160'-165' 0.082 0.108 5 205'-225' 0.096 5 205'-225' 0.163 * 0.187 * 5 225'-250' 0.068 5 225'-250' 0.213 * 0.236 * 5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.093 5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.102 5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.155 5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.180 5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.190 5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.260 5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 0.327 5 250'-275' excluding 260'-265' 2.435(a) 5 275'-300' 0.067 0.032 5 275'-300' Johnson 0.566 * 0.306 * 5 305'-330' 0.040 5 305'-330' Johnson 0.251 * 0.146 *** 5 305'-330' 0.070 0.060 Now, if the Johnson/Lett Method was used on the assays in last week's PR (as I believe) why are the assay results less then today's PR which did not use the Method for most of the samples? And even if the Johnson/Lett Method was not used on last week's, why are last's week's assays so much smaller than today's? Finally, why weren't these assay samples duplicated by RMG? Don't get me wrong, I thought today's PR was a few standards above last week's. But I still have questions I would like answered. Long with a sell hair trigger, WFS